SynthesisBMC pediatrics2026
Maternal risk factors associated with neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) is a multifactorial intestinal disorder that affects 2-5% of premature infants and has a mortality rate of 20-30%. Maternal factors such as breastmilk feeding and antenatal corticosteroid therapy have been found to influence NEC development in infants, yet other maternal and perinatal contributors have not been analyzed in detail. A better understanding of the role of specific maternal factors in NEC development can help identify infants at risk. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the pooled association between Cesarean section delivery, smoking, preeclampsia, chorioamnionitis, diabetes mellitus, and maternal education on the development of NEC.
methodsWe systematically searched for journal articles published before April 2025 in Springer Nature Link, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Results were narrowed down using the Boolean search string ("necrotizing enterocolitis" OR "neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis") AND (("maternal risk" OR "maternal factors") OR ("smoking" OR "preeclampsia" OR "chorioamnionitis" OR "diabetes")). Studies were included if they reported NEC incidence rates for any of the examined factors. Two evaluators independently screened and extracted literature, and disagreements were resolved through discussion. Interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa.
resultsWe identified 74 manuscripts that met the inclusion criteria, of which 26 were suitable for our meta-analysis. We calculated unadjusted ORs from extracted 2 × 2 data, as adjusted estimates were infrequently reported and were not pooled. The unadjusted pooled risk calculation showed a higher odds of NEC for both preeclampsia (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.15-3.06, n = 4) and smoking during pregnancy (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.66-2.28, n = 6). Funnel plots and Egger's regression tests indicated no evidence of publication bias for maternal factors with more than 10 studies.
conclusionsThis study highlights a significant pooled unadjusted association between maternal smoking and preeclampsia during pregnancy and the development of NEC. Chorioamnionitis and Cesarean sections alone were not significantly associated with NEC in this pooled unadjusted analysis, despite conflicting claims from other studies. This meta-analysis underscores the need for more research to be conducted to analyze the association between maternal smoking, preeclampsia, Cesarean sections, chorioamnionitis, and maternal education on the development of NEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.