ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2026
Expanding the pig metabolomics QTL catalog.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the genetic regulation of metabolism is essential for improving animal health and productivity and for strengthening the use of pigs as translational models for human metabolic diseases. Metabolomics, when integrated with genomic data, provides a powerful framework for identifying genetic factors that influence intermediate molecular phenotypes closely linked to physiology. While large-scale metabolomics genome‑wide association studies (GWAS) have been extensively performed in humans, comparable studies in pigs remain limited. Among omics disciplines, metabolomics, the systematic study of metabolites central to physiology, represents the omics layer most closely linked to end-point phenotypes in mammals, such as health and production traits (e.g. growth rate). Metabolite levels are influenced by genetics, diet, and microbiome composition, with human studies showing high heritability and identifying numerous metabolite quantitative trait loci (mQTLs). While such findings have advanced our understanding of disease biology in humans, comparable studies in pigs remain limited.
resultsWe performed GWAS of the serum metabolome in 213 three‑way crossbred pigs [(Landrace × Yorkshire) × Duroc], analyzing 248 metabolites and 30,628 metabolite ratios. We identified 41 significant metabolite-variant associations, which were consolidated into 18 mQTLs based on linkage disequilibrium (LD). Several regions were associated with multiple, biochemically related metabolites, while others showed highly specific effects. Cross-species comparison with the human GWAS catalog revealed candidate genes within seven mQTLs. Through an integrative prioritization strategy, putative causal genes-predominantly enzymes and transporters-were identified for 14 of 18 mQTLs.
conclusionsOur results expand the catalog of genetic loci influencing serum metabolite variation in pigs and highlight both conserved and pig specific components of metabolic regulation. These findings provide a foundation for incorporating metabolomics into pig breeding programs and reinforce the value of pigs as a translational model for studying metabolite-associated traits and diseases in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.