Observational studyBMC geriatrics2026
Vascular risk factors after stroke in the older people: a population-based study.
Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of recurrent stroke can be reduced by controlling modifiable risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes. We aim to assess control of these key factors in a representative cohort of stroke survivors residing in Catalonia, Spain. The analysis was conducted according to the current European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines, with special emphasis on an older population.
methodsAn observational, retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted using data from the population-based database of the Health Quality and Assessment Agency of Catalonia. Patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) between 2014 and 2019 were included. Follow-up data comprised all measurements recorded during the first year after the index event. Data were collected on blood pressure, cholesterol, and HbA1c levels, as well as on pharmacological treatment, including antithrombotic agents. A comparative analysis was performed across age groups, focusing particularly on older people (> 67 years) and very older people (> 87 years) stroke survivors. In total, 35,918 patients were included in the analysis.
resultsOf 35,918 included patients, 54% were men and the median age was 77 years (IQR 68-88); 9336 (23%) were older than 87 years. During the first year after stroke, blood pressure data were available for 63% of patients. Among them, 49% of individuals aged 18-67 years and 42% of the very older people achieved the target of < 130 mmHg. Despite blood tests with total cholesterol were available for 59%, LDL-cholesterol was specifically assessed only in 5% of patients, with 31% of the younger group and 35% of the very older people reaching the < 70 mg/dL target. Among patients with diabetes, HbA1c was assessed in 84%, and 81% of younger versus 83% of older people met the < 7% target. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation increased significantly with age; however, older people were less likely to receive oral anticoagulants (63% vs. 72-73%).
conclusionA substantial proportion of stroke survivors did not achieve the targets recommended by the ESO for secondary prevention. In the older people population, fewer patients reached optimal blood pressure control, and anticoagulant use among those with atrial fibrillation was suboptimal. Our findings highlight the need for structured post-stroke follow-up pathways, improved communication between stroke specialists and primary care physicians, and targeted interventions to optimize cardiovascular risk factor management in older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.