ArticleBMC nephrology2026
Rituximab and corticosteroids for M-protein-negative PGNMID: case report.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe report a case of a 69-year-old patient negative for serum M-protein who was diagnosed with proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) via renal biopsy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 69-year-old male presented with hematuria, edema, and rapidly progressive renal failure. Serum M-protein was negative, but renal biopsy confirmed IgG3-κ PGNMID with intense C3 deposition and an MPGN-like pattern. Rituximab was initiated, but due to a pulmonary infection, only one of the planned rituximab doses was administered. After infection resolution, the patient's renal function gradually improved (serum creatinine from 914 to 134 µmol/L) under long-term corticosteroid maintenance. Whether this improvement resulted from the single rituximab dose, prolonged corticosteroids, resolution of sepsis-associated AKI, or natural disease course remains uncertain. This case underscores that PGNMID, though rare, should be considered in seronegative patients with unexplained glomerulonephritis, and highlights the critical role of renal biopsy.
conclusionsPGNMID should be considered in rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, even when M-protein is negative. In this patient, a single reduced dose of rituximab combined with prolonged corticosteroids was associated with a favorable renal outcome, suggesting that a B-cell-directed, clone-directed approach may be a reasonable option worth further evaluation in seronegative PGNMID. Nonetheless, causality cannot be established from a single case, and the relative contributions of the individual therapies remain uncertain. Further studies are needed to define the optimal treatment for this rare entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.