ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Perceived fatalism regarding possible COVID-19 infection and its association with self-reported comorbidities in 12 Latin American countries.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has had substantial mental health consequences worldwide. However, evidence on perceived fatalism regarding possible COVID-19 infection, particularly in relation to self-reported comorbidities, remains limited in Latin America.
objectiveTo assess perceived fatalism regarding possible COVID-19 infection and its association with self-reported comorbidities among participants recruited in 12 Latin American countries.
methodsThis multicenter analytical cross-sectional study used a non-probability online snowball sampling strategy from June to August 2020. The study included 6,530 participants from Peru, Chile, Paraguay, Mexico, Colombia, Bolivia, Panama, Ecuador, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala. Perceived fatalism was assessed using five items from a previously developed COVID-19 fatalism scale. The five-item overall score was the primary measure, whereas domain-specific analyses were considered exploratory because of their lower reliability. Self-reported respiratory disease, cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and other illnesses were analyzed as exposure variables. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using generalized linear models from the Poisson family with log link and robust variance.
resultsThe median age was 22 years (IQR: 19-28), 58.8% of participants were female, 25.3% reported at least one comorbidity, and 55.0% of the sample was recruited in Peru. The five-item fatalism scale showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.707; McDonald's omega/Raykov's rho = 0.721). In adjusted models, high overall fatalism was more prevalent among participants reporting respiratory disease (aPR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.30), cardiac disease (aPR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08-1.44), diabetes mellitus (aPR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.61), obesity (aPR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.37), and other illnesses (aPR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.39). Men had a lower prevalence of high overall fatalism (aPR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.94). Sensitivity analyses yielded materially similar estimates.
conclusionsIn this non-probabilistic sample from 12 Latin American countries, self-reported comorbidities were associated with a modestly higher prevalence of perceived fatalism regarding possible COVID-19 infection. These findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating, given the cross-sectional design, self-reported exposures, potential residual confounding, and the young, Peru-predominant, non-probability sample. They should not be interpreted as nationally representative estimates or as evidence of causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.