ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Webcams can be used to study eye movements during reading.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye movements have revealed a wealth of information about how readers process written language. Modern eye trackers can record eye movements in the lab with high accuracy. However, such equipment is expensive, and participant testing is labour-intensive. Kaduk et al. (Behav Res Methods 56(5):5002-5022, 2023) recently reported that webcam eye tracking may be a viable alternative, showing that webcams achieved correlations with laboratory eye trackers of ~0.83 during a free-viewing task. We conducted three experiments to test whether webcams can be used to study eye movements during reading. Participants read short sentences with a target word frequency manipulation while their eye movements were recorded with both an EyeLink system and a webcam in the laboratory (co-registration, Experiments 1 and 2) or online with their own webcam (online study, Experiment 3). In the lab, the webcam-based system recorded raw gaze positions that were highly correlated with the EyeLink (median r = 0.805), replicating Kaduk et al.'s results. We also found evidence for word frequency effects in the webcam data, but there was more noise than in the EyeLink data. In the online study, data quality was much poorer, but we still found reliable effects that were consistent with those observed in the laboratory. In summary, webcam-based eye tracking may be viable for studying reading, especially under laboratory conditions. However, obtaining useful data may require collecting many more observations when using webcams than with high-accuracy eye trackers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.