ReviewLung2026
Phase 3 Antifibrotic-Directed Therapy Outcomes in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Beyond FVC Decline.
Review in Lung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhase 3 evidence for antifibrotic-directed therapies in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has expanded, but direct head-to-head trials are lacking. Forced vital capacity (FVC) decline remains the principal trial outcome, although it may not fully capture clinically relevant differences among therapies.
methodsWe systematically reviewed phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials of antifibrotic-directed therapies in IPF. FVC effects versus placebo were descriptively summarized using standardized 48-52-week estimates. All-cause treatment discontinuation and all-cause mortality were analyzed using placebo-controlled odds ratios. Sensitivity analyses assessed follow-up duration, background antifibrotic therapy, and trial-level consistency.
resultsTen trials including 5,386 randomized participants were included. Pirfenidone and nintedanib showed consistent reductions in FVC decline versus placebo. Inhaled treprostinil showed a favorable FVC signal in the combined TETON-1/2 evidence, largely as add-on therapy with background antifibrotic treatment. Without background antifibrotic therapy, several therapies showed directionally favorable but imprecise FVC effects, without evidence of equivalence. Nintedanib and inhaled treprostinil were associated with higher odds of all-cause treatment discontinuation versus placebo: OR 1.39 (95% CI, 1.02-1.88) and OR 1.39 (95% CI, 1.08-1.78), respectively. Pirfenidone was the only therapy associated with lower odds of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.83), based on published pooled ASCEND/CAPACITY mortality data and the Japanese phase 3 trial.
conclusionsFVC decline remains essential but may not fully distinguish antifibrotic-directed therapies in IPF. Integrating FVC effects, background therapy, treatment continuation, and mortality provides a cautious, context-dependent framework for interpreting expanding phase 3 evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42907709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.