Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42907695›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Discriminatory Practice in Opioid Use Disorder: In a Post-X-Waiver Era, Barriers to Buprenorphine Persist.

Hannah Freibert, Michelle R Lofwall, Anna-Maria South

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah FreibertCollege of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Michelle R LofwallDepartments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Anna-Maria SouthDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Addiction Consult and Education Service, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. annamaria.south@uky.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple court settlements established that it is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for skilled-nursing facilities (SNF) to refuse to care for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are on medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Yet, this discriminatory practice persists. This perspective discusses the case of a patient with cirrhosis and OUD, who was not allowed to return to his SNF due to starting buprenorphine during a hospitalization, and highlights why stigma and knowledge deficits continue to be barriers to this mortality-reducing treatment resulting in increased length of stay and negative outcomes. Sublingual buprenorphine is a commonly utilized MOUD due to its safety profile as a partial µ-opioid agonist and was what this patient with cirrhosis received. Due to the patient's resilience in the face of discrimination, the hospital's advocacy efforts including clinician-to-clinician conversations and the SNF's willingness to learn about best practice clinical guidelines and align with the ADA, this patient was able to return to the SNF on buprenorphine, despite delays in care. This perspective outlines tools that hospitalists can use in advocacy efforts with SNFs to improve MOUD treatment adoption as they leave the acute hospital setting.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.