ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Impact of phytosphingosine-enriched experimental toothpaste on dental enamel integrity: a combined in vitro and in situ investigation.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluated the effects of a phytosphingosine-enriched toothpaste (PET) versus a commercial toothpaste on dental enamel using in vitro and in situ approaches. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn vitro, bovine enamel specimens were assigned to one of three brushing agents, artificial saliva, Colgate Total 12, or PET and subjected to simulated brushing (40, 280, 600, and 1,200 cycles), each representing the estimated brushing exposure for 1, 7, 15, and 30 days, respectively. Each group of specimens were evaluated at all time points throughout the 30-day period. Surface roughness and microhardness were measured. In situ, 14 volunteers used appliances containing enamel samples, brushed with the same toothpastes. Roughness, microhardness, and biofilm accumulation were assessed. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) characterized enamel surfaces post-treatment.
resultsIn vitro, PET showed lower surface roughness than saliva at 7 days (p < 0.05) and results comparable to the commercial product. Microhardness reduction was significantly greater with PET than with the commercial toothpaste at all evaluated time points (p < 0.05). In situ, no significant differences in roughness or microhardness were observed among groups (p > 0.05). However, PET significantly reduced biofilm compared to saliva (p < 0.05). AFM revealed smooth surfaces with both PET and the commercial product.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the PHS-enriched toothpaste did not adversely affect enamel integrity and resulted in significantly lower biofilm coverage on enamel, suggesting its potential for use in preventive oral care formulations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that a phytosphingosine-enriched toothpaste is a promising option for preventive dentistry, as it resulted in lower biofilm accumulation on enamel without compromising enamel integrity. Given the central role of biofilm in the development of caries and periodontal disease, these findings provide scientific support for the future development of safer oral hygiene products as alternatives to conventional agents such as triclosan and chlorhexidine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42907688What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.