Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42907594›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Comparison of sexual function and postoperative recovery following V-NOTES versus laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation and salpingectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Onur Ada, Uğurcan Dagli, Egehan Bilen, Emre Bayram, Didem Sezen, Abdurrahman Hamdi Inan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07637201 (Randomised Prospective Comparison of Sexual Function and Postoperative Recovery Following V-NOTES Versus Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation and Salpingectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07637201 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Randomised Prospective Comparison of Sexual Function and Postoperative Recovery Following V-NOTES Versus Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation and Salpingectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorTepecik Training and Research HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled118ConditionsSexual Function Scores, Postoperative RecoveryArmsV-NOTES Bilateral Tubal Ligation or Salpingectomy, Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation or Salpingectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Onur AdaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, 35100, Izmir, Turkey. adaonurada@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4931-4759
Uğurcan DagliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, 35100, Izmir, Turkey.
Egehan BilenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital, 35390, Izmir, Turkey.
Emre BayramDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Izmir City Hospital, 35540, Izmir, Turkey.
Didem SezenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, 35100, Izmir, Turkey.
Abdurrahman Hamdi InanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, 35100, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe compared sexual function and postoperative recovery between transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) and conventional laparoscopy in women undergoing bilateral tubal ligation or salpingectomy for sterilisation.

methodsWe randomised 108 women equally to V-NOTES or laparoscopy. The primary outcome was change in total female sexual function Index (FSFI) score from baseline to 6 weeks and 6 months, analysed as two primary comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment. Secondary outcomes included FSFI domains, perioperative outcomes and complications. First intercourse was recorded at the 6-week visit. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT07637201 (retrospectively registered).

resultsAll participants completed both assessments. At 6 weeks, total FSFI changed by 0.90 (SD 1.97) after laparoscopy and - 4.01 (SD 1.43) after V-NOTES: difference - 4.91 (95% CI - 5.56 to - 4.25; adjusted P < 0.001). At 6 months, changes were 1.63 and 1.86, respectively: difference 0.23 (95% CI - 0.34 to 0.79; adjusted P = 0.855). All participants resumed intercourse before the 6-week assessment, at a median of 39 days after V-NOTES and 15 days after laparoscopy. The median interval from first intercourse to assessment, capped at 28 days, was 4 and 27 days, respectively. V-NOTES was associated with lower 6-h pain (median 4 versus 6), earlier discharge (27 versus 29 h) and longer operative time (70.0 versus 52.5 min; all adjusted P < 0.001). Three complications occurred, all after V-NOTES.

conclusionsThe lower 6-week FSFI score after V-NOTES reflects the combined effect of surgery and its routine postoperative course, including later resumption of intercourse. It cannot be attributed to the transvaginal route alone. No significant between-group difference in the change in total FSFI score was detected at 6 months; equivalence was not assessed. V-NOTES was associated with less early pain, modestly earlier discharge and longer surgery. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT07637201; first submitted 1 June 2026, first submitted with quality-control criteria met 5 June 2026, first posted 9 June 2026 (retrospectively registered, after recruitment had been completed).

Indexed as

FSFILaparoscopySalpingectomySterilisationTubal ligationV-NOTES

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.