ArticleHeredity2026
Complex maternal genetic landscape in the Koṅkaṇī population of India.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Koṅkaṇ region on the west coast of India is a hotspot of culture, folklore and ethnolinguistic diversity, yet its maternal genetic landscape remains largely unresolved. The present study captures the genetic affinities of the Koṅkaṇī population, residing along the Koṅkaṇ Malabar coast by analysing complete mitochondrial genomes (n = 85) and control region hypervariable sequences (n = 210). Our results reveal divergent maternal histories between the Sārasvata and the non-Sārasvata groups. Comparative analysis against over 5000 mitochondrial genomes from Eurasia demonstrates that the Koṅkaṇī maternal gene pool is shaped by both deep-rooted South Asian (macro-haplogroup M) and West Eurasian lineages. Demographic modelling identifies a pre-Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) expansion and a post-LGM recovery, with macro-haplogroup N lineages serving as the primary drivers of internal genetic structuring. At the subpopulation level, occupational groups such as the Khārvi and Kuḍubi exhibit genetic signatures that are consistent with historic founder events followed by increased genetic drift relative to Gauḍa Sārasvata Brahmins and Roman Catholics, where populations display higher haplotype diversity. Social practices, including endogamy, may contribute to the differences observed between these populations. While the non-Sārasvata group clusters with autochthonous tribes, the Sārasvata groups share genetic affinities with West Eurasian and Steppe-linked lineages, suggesting that the Bronze Age migrations into South Asia were not exclusively male-mediated. Overall, this study highlights the Koṅkaṇ coast as a genetic confluence, where Late Pleistocene migrations, LGM refugia, and Holocene admixture collectively shaped its maternal ancestry. It also illustrates how climate and social shifts moulded the extant genetic diversity along western India.
Identifiers
42907561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.