ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Hepatic postinterventional imaging : Modality selection, assessment of therapeutic response, recognition, and radiological management of typical complications].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostprocedural imaging following hepatic interventions is essential for monitoring treatment success and detecting complications.
objectiveTo provide an overview of imaging follow-up after hepatic interventions (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS], percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage [PTCD], transarterial chemoembolization [TACE], ablation, selective internal radiotherapy [SIRT]), focusing on the selection of imaging modalities, the assessment of treatment success, and the recognition and radiological management of complications. MATERIALS AND
methodsNarrative review based on the current literature of hepatic radiological interventions.
resultsThe procedure determines the choice of imaging modality. Following TIPS, functional monitoring is primarily performed using duplex ultrasound. PTCD follow-up focuses on drainage placement and bleeding complications. Following TACE and ablation, immediate hypoperfusion of the lesions is to be expected, whereas a temporary increase in size and peripheral enhancement may occur. Following SIRT, a delayed onset of the treatment effect, as detectable by imaging morphology, is characteristic. Bleeding, abscess formation, fistulas, stent occlusions or malfunctions, and tumor recurrences can be treated further using interventional radiology.
conclusionKnowledge of typical postprocedural imaging findings, as well as common complications and options for radiological treatment of complications, is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42907486What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.