Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42907486›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Hepatic postinterventional imaging : Modality selection, assessment of therapeutic response, recognition, and radiological management of typical complications].

Antonia Dalmer, Hanka Arndt, Lennart Well, Avinash Kambadakone, Isabel Molwitz

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonia DalmerInstitut und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Kinder- und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland. antonia.dalmer@med.uni-rostock.de.
Hanka ArndtInstitut und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Kinder- und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.
Lennart WellKlinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Avinash KambadakoneAbdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Isabel MolwitzKlinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostprocedural imaging following hepatic interventions is essential for monitoring treatment success and detecting complications.

objectiveTo provide an overview of imaging follow-up after hepatic interventions (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS], percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage [PTCD], transarterial chemoembolization [TACE], ablation, selective internal radiotherapy [SIRT]), focusing on the selection of imaging modalities, the assessment of treatment success, and the recognition and radiological management of complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsNarrative review based on the current literature of hepatic radiological interventions.

resultsThe procedure determines the choice of imaging modality. Following TIPS, functional monitoring is primarily performed using duplex ultrasound. PTCD follow-up focuses on drainage placement and bleeding complications. Following TACE and ablation, immediate hypoperfusion of the lesions is to be expected, whereas a temporary increase in size and peripheral enhancement may occur. Following SIRT, a delayed onset of the treatment effect, as detectable by imaging morphology, is characteristic. Bleeding, abscess formation, fistulas, stent occlusions or malfunctions, and tumor recurrences can be treated further using interventional radiology.

conclusionKnowledge of typical postprocedural imaging findings, as well as common complications and options for radiological treatment of complications, is crucial.

Indexed as

Ablation techniquesDrainagePortasystemic shunt, transjugular intrahepaticPostoperative complicationsRadiology, interventional

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.