ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Precision oncology in advanced melanoma: molecular landscapes and personalized therapy recommendations from the Molecular Tumor Board Freiburg.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and BRAF/MEK kinase inhibitors have substantially improved survival in advanced melanoma; however, therapeutic resistance and severe toxicities underscore the ongoing need for alternative strategies. Here, we evaluate the clinical utility of multi-omic profiling, biomarker-stratified recommendations, and survival outcomes within a prospective cohort of 98 patients with advanced cutaneous or uveal melanoma evaluated by the Molecular Tumor Board Freiburg (MTB-FR) between 2021 and 2024. Completed profiling revealed at least one potential actionable target beyond classical BRAF V600 mutations in 83.8% of cases. Alterations in NRAS, atypical BRAF variants, CDK4/6 pathway amplifications, and DNA-damage response (DDR) gene mutations most frequently guided board recommendations. Biomarker-stratified therapies were recommended for 68.4% of patients, and personalized immunotherapy combinations for 72.4%. The treatment implementation rate was 33.8% (n = 27), achieving an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 42.9% and an overall response rate (ORR) of 10.7%. These findings demonstrate that comprehensive molecular profiling in a real-world setting uncovers actionable alterations, providing viable subsequent treatment avenues that may optimize outcomes for heavily pretreated melanoma patients beyond established standards of care. Ultimately, prospective, randomized, biomarker-driven trials remain essential to validate whether these individualized diagnostic strategies translate into a reproducible survival benefit.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.