ArticleNature communications2026
Actionable genetic landscape and dynamics in circulating DNA from 12,827 patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a sensitive, noninvasive tool for monitoring the genomic landscape, heterogeneity, and evolution of cancer, aggregating genetic information from multiple metastatic sites. Here, we study 15,564 cfDNA samples from 12,827 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We classify samples, deep-sequenced with Guardant360, into MBC subtypes using our trained random forest model. Most patients have variants associated with therapeutic resistance and targetability of approved and experimental therapies, including in PIK3CA, ESR1, PTEN, and AKT1. Frequencies of multiple actionable alterations differed from primary disease, and multiple variants per gene suggest independent resistant clones. The large cohort size enables uncovering clonal co-behaviors, including co-existence and exclusivity of alleles and correlation of allele fractions. cfDNA testing is now recommended in multiple advanced malignancies, including eligibility assessment for clinical trials. We envision this large collection of MBC cfDNA data as an invaluable resource for the design and planning of future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.