ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Navigating Treatment Pathways in Diabetic Foot Infection: A Practical Retrospective Analysis of Healing Predictors and the WIfI System.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a major cause of lower-extremity amputation. Evidence on optimal management remains inconsistent, and real-world data from multidisciplinary centres are limited. This study describes the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with DFI at a tertiary referral centre. This retrospective cross-sectional study included all patients with diabetes and confirmed DFI presenting since 2022. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and wound-related data were recorded, and wounds were classified using the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) system. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses identified predictors of healing duration. 69 patients were included (mean age 56.4 ± 13.2 years; 58% male). Most wounds were deep (88.2%); osteomyelitis occurred in 42.2%. Conservative wound care was used in 73.9%, and 79.7% underwent bedside debridement. Minor and major amputation rates were 16.2% and 1.4%. The median healing time was 45 days (interquartile range [IQR] 54), and the mean healing time was 56.0 ± 44.9 days. Healing duration correlated with wound grade, WIfI stage, infection severity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cell (WBC) count, international normalized ratio (INR), wound area, and delay to specialist assessment. Wound grade was the only independent predictor of healing time (β = 0.606, p = 0.001). Limb-preserving management was associated with a low major amputation rate. Wound severity was the strongest determinant of healing duration, underscoring the importance of early referral and structured risk stratification in DFI care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.