ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Closed-Loop Multi-Objective Optimization for Receptor-Selective Cell-Penetrating Peptide Design.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) can deliver diverse cargoes into cells. However, designing CPPs with receptor-selective interaction profiles remains difficult because interactions with individual cell-surface components cannot be tuned independently. Here, we developed a closed-loop in silico framework for receptor-selective CPP design, in which receptor interactions are formulated as explicit objectives in a multi-objective optimization problem. We first constructed a CPP-like candidate library by using a sequence generative model fine-tuned on known CPPs. The framework then evaluated candidate peptides by receptor-wise docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and MM/GBSA to compute receptor-wise binding scores as computational proxies for receptor-associated interactions. These scores were used iteratively to propose subsequent candidates by multi-objective Bayesian optimization. Applied to a CXCR4/NRP1 design setting, the framework identified candidates with more favorable predicted interaction profiles characterized by higher CXCR4 binding scores and lower NRP1 binding scores. We selected 10 peptides from the computationally identified candidates for cell-based imaging and found that 4 showed higher enrichment in CXCR4-positive regions than in NRP1-positive regions under the tested conditions. These results show that the proposed framework provides a practical in silico approach for designing CPPs with receptor-selective interaction profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.