ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Sex-Specific Responses to Social Calls Shape Foraging Decisions in a Nectar-Feeding Bat.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foraging in social animals involves balancing the benefits of social information against the costs of competition. In nectarivorous bats, social vocalizations are commonly produced at feeding sites, yet it remains unclear whether males and females respond differently to such signals. We investigated this by testing how alert calls linked to aggressive interactions and benign social calls influence foraging choices in bats (Glossophaga mutica handleyi). Bats changed their flower choices in response to playbacks, revealing marked sex differences. Males avoided flowers paired with alert calls, whereas females preferred them. Conversely, males showed no response to benign calls, whereas females were consistently drawn to flowers paired with social calls regardless of call type. Acoustic analyses revealed no differences between male and female alert calls, suggesting that these sex-specific responses stem from receiver behavior rather than signal design. Furthermore, only dominant males approached flowers associated with alert calls, suggesting that competitive ability influences responses to conflict-related signals. Overall, these results demonstrate that the same social signal can trigger different behavioral strategies in male and female bats. Our study underscores the importance of receiver-dependent processes in shaping communication systems and shows that sex-specific responses to social signals can develop without sex-specific variation in signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.