Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905935›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

How Can Speech and Language Therapists be Supported to Make Decisions Regarding Communication Therapy for People With Dementia? A Realist Theory-Development Study.

Anna Hockley, Melania Calestani, Sarah Griffiths, Suzanne Beeke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna HockleyDepartment of Human Communication Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9276-2488
Melania CalestaniDepartment of Midwifery, School of Education, Midwifery and Social Work, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8030-9478
Sarah GriffithsResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2652-3163
Suzanne BeekeDepartment of Human Communication Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6772-2820

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs of 2021, there were 57 million people with dementia worldwide, and there are 885,000 people with dementia in the UK. Communication difficulties occur in all forms of dementia. Increasing difficulty communicating thoughts and needs affects social interaction and personal relationships, with implications for individuals' and their relatives' quality of life. Speech and language therapists are trained to provide communication support to people experiencing communication difficulties. However, whether people with dementia are offered communication support from speech and language therapy services varies significantly across the UK. This study aimed to explain how speech and language therapists currently make clinical decisions about offering communication support, and to explain how further guidance such as a decision-aid for clinicians may help people with dementia to receive more equitable care.

methodsThis study used realist methods to develop a programme theory relating to speech and language therapist decision-making for dementia communication interventions, in order to inform future work to develop a decision-aid for non-dementia specialist speech and language therapists. Theories were produced and refined through an iterative process including literature review, stakeholder engagement and focus groups with speech and language therapists to help explain how speech and language therapists make decisions and how a decision-aid could support this process. Data was analysed through a top-down approach using an analytic appraisal journal, and a bottom-up approach using deductive and inductive coding.

resultsEighteen speech and language therapists participated in four focus groups. Eight theory statements were identified relating to how speech and language therapists currently make decisions about how, when and what type of communication therapy to offer people with dementia. Speech and language therapists make decisions about provision of communication therapy based on factors including staffing levels, prioritisation criteria, number of referrals received, personal beliefs, confidence, self-perceived skills, and team culture. Eight theories relating to how a proposed decision-aid might function were identified: provide therapy examples, peer support, service model examples, tailor for underserved groups, highlight the need for ongoing support, empower junior clinicians, and promote awareness of communication in dementia.

conclusionThis study explored how and why speech and language therapists make particular decisions when working with people with dementia experiencing communication difficulties, identifying possible mechanisms through which a decision-aid could assist this process. A decision-aid could address barriers to decision-making for communication support in dementia through enhancing speech and language therapists' knowledge, skills and confidence, while promoting equitable and sustained care. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Progressive communication difficulties experienced as part of dementia can affect social interaction, personal relationships and quality of life of the person with dementia and their relatives. Speech and language therapists are well-placed to provide communication support, but provision of this in dementia varies widely across the UK. It is unclear how speech and language therapists currently make decisions about offering communication support in dementia. What this study adds to the existing knowledge This study uses realist methods to better understand the current decision-making processes of speech and language therapists relating to communication support in dementia. It uses literature review, stakeholder engagement and focus groups with clinicians to develop theories to help explain how decisions are currently made, and to propose mechanisms through which a decision-aid may help speech and language therapists to make informed decisions. What are the clinical implications of this study? The findings suggest that speech and language therapists face significant challenges in delivering communication therapy to people with dementia due to systemic under-resourcing, limited awareness of their role, and competing clinical priorities. The proposed decision-aid could address some of these barriers by enhancing speech and language therapists' knowledge, skills and confidence, while promoting equitable and sustained care. If effectively implemented, it has the potential to expand access to communication support, foster professional growth, and drive a broader recognition of communication as a vital element of dementia care.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingCommunication DisordersDementiaLanguage TherapySpeech TherapyDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFocus GroupsHumansUnited Kingdomdementiafocus grouppeer supportpsychological interventionpsychologysocial relationstaffingstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID42905935
PMCPMC13686552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.