ReviewEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Specific effects of Pulsed Field Ablation on the cardiac tissue, the nervous system and the conduction system in experimental and clinical studies.
Review in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsPulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel ablation modality for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and has rapidly reshaped contemporary electrophysiology practice. This article provides a comprehensive analysis on the mechanisms underlying the specific effects of PFA on myocardial, neural tissue structures, and the cardiac conduction system, integrating biophysical principles with preclinical and clinical evidence relevant to contemporary electrophysiology practice. METHODS AND
resultsThis document provides an exhaustive mechanistic explanation for the preferential effects of PFA on myocardium and the limits of the 'tissue-selectivity' concept. The complex interplay between cellular and tissue-level biophysics, biological responses, and tissue regenerative capacity that determines differential susceptibility to electroporation across tissues is analysed. Distinct patterns of lesion formation and maturation following PFA are also reviewed, highlighting the temporal and histopathological differences compared with radiofrequency ablation. Additionally, lesion formation in heterogeneous substrates is analysed, including fibrotic and adipose-rich myocardium, where local electric field distribution critically influences lesion durability.
conclusionThe article further examines the interaction between pulsed electric fields and neural tissue, with emphasis on the phrenic nerve and intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system. While nerve stimulation and transient reversible conduction disturbances produced by reversible electroporation can occur during ablation, permanent neural injury appears extremely rare in current clinical experience. Finally, this manuscript examines current understanding regarding the specific effects of PFA on the cardiac conduction system, which according to the limited available evidence appear strongly dependent on electric field dose and anatomical proximity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.