Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905913›Full record

ReviewEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026

Treatment of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation with pulsed field ablation.

Serge Boveda, Kyoung-Ryul Julian Chun, Pierre Jais, Nicolas Johner, Claire A Martin, Rami Daya, Andrea Sarkozy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Serge BovedaHeart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, 45 Avenue de Lombez, 31300 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1280-7042
Kyoung-Ryul Julian ChunKlinik fur Rhythmologie, CCB am Markus Krankenhaus, Wilhelm-Epstein 4, 60431 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2355-6015
Pierre JaisHopital Cardiologique du Haut-Leveque, CHU de Bordeaux, Avenue de Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4700-7811
Nicolas JohnerHopital Cardiologique du Haut-Leveque, CHU de Bordeaux, Avenue de Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8236-1165
Claire A MartinDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0AY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7755-3613
Rami DayaRhythm Management Medical Affairs, Boston Scientific, Masaref Street, 13-6045 Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0009-0004-9917-0401
Andrea SarkozyHeart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Jette, Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6327-0487

Funding

Boston Scientific
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation has emerged as a novel energy source for atrial fibrillation ablation, offering preferential myocardial ablation with a favourable safety profile. Contemporary paroxysmal AF clinical studies demonstrate 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence in approximately 75-85% of patients, with major complication rates generally ranging from 1 to 3%. Compared with thermal ablation, PFA offers comparable efficacy and streamlined procedural workflows. In persistent AF, PVI remains the foundation of ablation, while additional adjunctive strategies are increasingly evaluated. Current evidence suggests that PFA can achieve 12-month arrhythmia-free outcomes generally ranging from approximately 60-75% in persistent AF populations. Major procedure-related complications typically occur in <3% of cases, supporting the feasibility of broader lesion sets with an acceptable safety profile. However, the incremental benefit of adjunctive ablation beyond PVI and the optimal lesion set for persistent AF remain to be assessed further Outcome assessment after PFA requires consideration of evolving endpoints. The clinical relevance of the traditional post-ablation blanking period is being re-evaluated, while continuous rhythm monitoring and AF burden are increasingly incorporated alongside conventional recurrence endpoints. Patient-reported outcomes are an important component of PFA evaluation. Compared with thermal ablation, PFA is associated with improved procedural tolerability, reduced analgesic requirements, rapid recovery, and the potential for same-day discharge. These features, together with favourable efficacy and safety outcomes, may contribute to broader adoption of PFA across both paroxysmal and persistent AF populations.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsHeart RateHumansIrreversible Electroporation TherapyRecurrenceRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAF burdenAtrial fibrillationBlanking period definition for PFAClinical evidenceMeasurable outcomesMid and long term efficacyParoxysmal atrial fibrillationPatient reported measurable outcomesPatient-reported outcomes and quality of lifePersistent atrial fibrillationPost-ablation recovery and return to activityProcedural efficacyProcedural workflowPulsed field ablationPVI durabilitySafety

Identifiers

PMID42905913
PMCPMC13685803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.