Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905877›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Evaluation of quantitative accuracy in 4D DCE-bCT: Insights from a perfusion phantom study.

Liselot C Goris, Juan J Pautasso, Koen Michielsen, Ioannis Sechopoulos

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liselot C GorisTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Juan J PautassoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Koen MichielsenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ioannis SechopoulosTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 864929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFour-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced breast CT (4D DCE-bCT) provides submillimeter spatial resolution and temporal sampling within seconds, offering potential for improved perfusion assessment in breast cancer. Its quantitative accuracy, however, must be validated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of dynamic iodine concentration quantification in 4D DCE-bCT using a perfusion phantom with in-line optical spectroscopy and ultraviolet-visible (UV/VIS) spectrophotometry as reference standards.

methodsA dynamic flow phantom with a 3 mm internal diameter was used to approximate tumor-feeding vessels. Potassium iodide (KI) contrast was introduced using block-pulse injections at 1, 3, and 5 mg I/mL and a gradual inflow-outflow protocol to reproduce bolus passage. In-line optical spectroscopy and UV/VIS spectrophotometry provided reference measurements. Dynamic bCT acquisitions were performed using a previously developed sparse-view protocol. A static pre-contrast scan was reconstructed with the iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT (IMPACT), and post-contrast dynamic scans were reconstructed using the prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) algorithm. Acquisitions were performed at 65 kV with 0.25 mm Cu filtration, 80 mA for the pre-contrast scan (300 projections over 10 s) and 32 mA for the post-contrast scans (444 projections per 100 s), using a 5 ms pulse width. Projection data were corrected for scatter and motion before reconstruction, and the static prior was then subtracted from post-contrast volumes. Object-size effects were evaluated using the 3 mm tube and 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm hollow spheres filled with non-flowing iodine at 1, 3, and 5 mg I/mL. The tube interior was segmented using thresholding and morphological cleanup, while spherical phantoms were segmented by identifying the sphere center and extracting all enclosed voxels. Voxel values were converted to iodine concentration using a pre-determined calibration curve, and agreement with reference standards was evaluated using peak concentrations and time-concentration profiles, with errors reported as absolute and relative differences.

resultsIn dynamic block-pulse experiments, peak iodine concentrations measured by 4D DCE-bCT were systematically underestimated relative to ground truth, with relative errors of approximately 12% to 39%. In gradual inflow-outflow experiments, the peak iodine concentration derived from 4D DCE-bCT was 5.24 ± 0.61 mg I/mL, whereas optical ground truth measured 5.17 mg I/mL. Static experiments demonstrated an average underestimation of 0.23 ± 0.14 mg I/mL across target sizes and concentrations and no relationship between iodine estimation and target size.

conclusion4D DCE-bCT enabled acquisition of time-varying iodine concentration profiles in a 3 mm tube phantom. Gradual changes were captured more accurately compared to rapid changes, consistent with temporal averaging. These results demonstrate the feasibility of dynamic iodine imaging with 4D DCE-bCT while highlighting current limitations and motivating further evaluation in anatomically realistic phantoms and pilot clinical studies.

Indexed as

BreastContrast MediaFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyPhantoms, ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIodineContrast MediaIodine4D breast CTdynamic contrast‐enhanced imagingiodine quantificationperfusion phantom

Identifiers

PMID42905877
PMCPMC13686342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.