ArticlePLOS mental health2026
The association between orthorexia nervosa and social media use: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is a newly described mental disorder characterized by an extreme obsession with the consumption of healthy foods, resulting in anxiety and impaired functionality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize the association between social media use and orthorexic tendencies among adolescents and adults. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched through January 2026. Original studies assessing the association between social media use and ON were included. Zero-order correlations between social media and orthorexia measures were pooled using Fisher's z under a random-effects (REML) model; heterogeneity, subgroup and meta-regression, sensitivity and publication-bias analyses were performed; certainty was rated with GRADE. Of 33 included studies, 22 contributed to meta-analysis of the correlation between social media use and ON symptoms, yielding a small positive pooled correlation (r = 0.20, 95% CI 0.15-0.25; I² = 84.3%; very low certainty by GRADE). This association remained stable across leave-one-out, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses (r = 0.18-0.20), and after adjustment for potential publication bias (bias-adjusted r = 0.17). A secondary analysis of two studies with reconstructable 2 × 2 data suggested greater odds of ON among heavier users (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.25-1.97). Pooled ON prevalence differed sharply with the diagnostic threshold (39.9% at the ORTO-15 cutoff below 35 versus 65.5% below 40), reflecting extreme heterogeneity (I² > 90%) across studies. Narrative synthesis indicated that the type of content consumed was more consistently associated with ON than platform or duration of use alone Social media use is associated with greater orthorexic tendencies. However, because all included studies were cross-sectional and overall certainty of evidence was very low, causality and directionality cannot be established and reverse causality remains plausible. Longitudinal and experimental research is needed to clarify the direction of this relationship.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.