SynthesisPLoS medicine2026
Impact of violence on HIV outcomes among female sex workers: A global systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFemale sex workers (FSW) are a key population for HIV prevention and care. Increasing evidence suggests that social and structural barriers are key drivers of HIV transmission. This global systematic review assesses whether experiencing violence is associated with worse HIV outcomes among FSW. METHODS AND
findingsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for studies published from January 1st, 2010 to June 9th, 2026 assessing the impact of violence on HIV outcomes among FSW, without restriction to language and study design. Some studies had multiple estimates due to reporting on multiple outcomes or exposures of interest. We pooled data from eligible studies using multi-level random-effects meta-analyses to quantify associations between recent (past year) or lifetime exposure to violence (physical, sexual, emotional/psychological, and/or financial) and HIV outcomes (prevalent and incident HIV infection, HIV testing, ART use, ART adherence, and viral suppression) among FSW. We preferentially used adjusted estimates over unadjusted estimates if both were available. We included 94 studies with 226 estimates, comprising 186,613 FSWs in 39 countries. Half the included studies were in low- and middle-income countries (n = 47, 50%), and one-fifth were in low-income countries (n = 18; 19%). We found higher odds of prevalent HIV infection among FSWs with recent (pooled odds ratio (pOR):1.31; 95% CI [1.16,1.48]; I2: 63%; n = 75 estimates) and lifetime (pOR:1.35; 95% CI [1.23,1.48]; I2: 39%; n = 68) experiences of violence. When stratifying violence by type, we found the strongest pooled associations between recent (pOR:1.55; 95% CI [1.24,1.94]; I2: 69%; n = 28) and lifetime (pOR:1.40; 95% CI [1.21,1.63]; I2: 47%; n = 28) experiences of sexual violence and HIV prevalence. Recently experiencing violence was associated with reduced odds of ART use (pOR:0.78; 95% CI [0.64,0.94]; I2: 8%; n = 17). Lifetime exposure to violence was associated with reduced odds of viral suppression (pOR:0.88; 95% CI [0.79,0.98]; I2: 20%; n = 6). There was no evidence of associations between violence and HIV incidence, HIV testing, and ART adherence. Our study had limitations, notably the cross-sectional design of most included studies, the heterogeneity in pooled estimates, and the difficulties of measuring experiences of violence.
conclusionsExperiencing violence is associated with greater odds of prevalent HIV infections, and poorer HIV treatment outcomes among FSWs. HIV interventions for FSWs must address violence as a structural determinant of HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.