Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905781›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Impact of dephased entanglement, mixed input states and varying measurement orientations on the reliability of cryptographic keys generated via the quantum protocol E91.

Adrián F Hernández-Borda, María P Rojas-Sepúlveda, Hanz Y Ramírez-Gómez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrián F Hernández-BordaGrupo QUCIT, Escuela de Física, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja, Colombia.
María P Rojas-SepúlvedaGrupo QUCIT, Escuela de Física, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja, Colombia.
Hanz Y Ramírez-GómezGrupo QUCIT, Escuela de Física, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-6583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photons and optical circuits are among the most promising platforms for implementation of quantum technologies, including quantum computing and quantum cryptography. For entanglement-based quantum key distribution, on-demand sources of highly entangled photon pairs are essential, and semiconductor quantum dots have emerged as prominent candidates to satisfy the necessary conditions of brightness and fidelity. However, in most cases the photon pair emitted by these sources is an anomalous Bell state whose relative phase and purity are non-ideal, and then, their suitability for distributing secret keys must be assessed. This work studies the performance of the quantum key distribution protocol E91, under the influence of three elements: the phase in the input state, the impurity of such a state, and the relative directions of the polarization analyzers. We derive analytical expressions for the minimum quantum bit error rate and the Bell's parameter, and validate them by using quantum computational tools. Our results show that the performance of the quantum transmission is highly impacted by the phase and purity of the entangled input states, and that such an impact may be modulated through the orientation of the polarizers. These findings provide important insight for the scalable implementation of quantum key distribution protocols with realistic entanglement sources.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityQuantum MechanicsQuantum TheoryPhotonsQuantum DotsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42905781
PMCPMC13686278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.