Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905769›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

An advanced LLM-powered article extraction pipeline delivers a database of buffers for protein studies and protein expression conditions.

Zhuojian Chen, Eng Aloysius, J Sivaraman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhuojian ChenDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0007-9772-0010
Eng AloysiusDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
J SivaramanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9781-5326

Funding

Ministry of Education, Singapore A-8001519-00-00Ministry of Education, Singapore A-8002957-00-00National University of SingaporeNUS Inter Fund A-8004381-00-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing protein expression and buffer conditions is a major challenge in life-science research and biotechnology. We present an LLM-powered extraction pipeline that systematically converts unstructured scientific literature into a structured, queryable database. Leveraging advanced optical character recognition, custom reranker models, and large language models, our system achieves ~97% extraction accuracy. By processing 100 353 structural biology publications associated with the RCSB Protein Data Bank, we constructed a database containing 947 153 distinct buffer entries and 73 210 expression protocols for 35 690 unique proteins, establishing the largest resource of its kind. The ProBufEx (https://www.probufex.org/) web platform enables rapid exploration of optimal conditions by protein properties or functions. Case studies reveal distinct patterns in chemical usage on proteins with different post-translational modifications, and function-dependent expression strategies for proteins with different enzymatic activities. This resource transforms vast structural biology literature into actionable knowledge, accelerating evidence-based protocol design, reducing trial-and-error, and streamlining experiments in protein science.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, ProteinData MiningProteinsBiocurationLarge Language ModelsSoftwareProteinsbuffersdatabaseliterature miningLLMproteinsstrategies

Identifiers

PMID42905769
PMCPMC13685770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.