Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905757›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Monitoring seasonal and long-term forest canopy dynamics using Sentinel-2 imagery and Random Forest on the Google Earth Engine platform.

Pavan Kumar, Rahul Kumar, Soumyajeet Sahu, Manmohan Dobriyal, Pankaj Lavania, Manish Srivastav, Prem Chandra Pandey, Benson Turyasingura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pavan KumarDepartment of Forest Resource Management, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India.
Rahul KumarCentre of Geospatial Science and Technology, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India.
Soumyajeet SahuCentre of Geospatial Science and Technology, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India.
Manmohan DobriyalDepartment of Silviculture and Agroforestry, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India.
Pankaj LavaniaDepartment of Forest Resource Management, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India.
Manish SrivastavCollege of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, India.
Prem Chandra PandeyDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Natural Sciences (SoNS), Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence (Deemed to be University), Greater Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0049-1415
Benson TuryasinguraFaculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Kabale University, Kabale, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1325-4483

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding forest canopy dynamics is critical for assessing the condition, resilience, and conservation priorities of protected landscapes. This study evaluated the spatiotemporal and seasonal variation in mapped forest canopy density within the Orchha Wildlife Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh, India, using multi-seasonal Sentinel-2 imagery and a Google Earth Engine (GEE)-based Random Forest (RF) classification framework. Sentinel-2 data for pre-monsoon (March-May) and post-monsoon (October-December) periods in 2016 and 2024 were analyzed independently. Canopy-density information was derived from NDVI, NDMI, elevation, slope, and GLCM texture features and classified into four classes: non-forest, open, moderate, and dense canopy. The same RF procedure was applied to all four season-year datasets using NDVI-informed canopy-density strata and balanced reference sampling. Overall accuracy ranged from 97.80% to 98.95%, with Kappa coefficients of 0.970-0.986. The results indicated clear seasonal and interannual redistribution of mapped canopy-density classes. During the pre-monsoon period, non-forest and open classes decreased by 39.62% and 7.15%, respectively, while moderate and dense classes increased by 231.64% and 240.43%. During the post-monsoon period, moderate canopy increased by 26.01%, whereas dense canopy decreased by 9.46%. Within the common comparison area of 4,533.54 ha, transition analysis revealed substantial class persistence and redistribution, particularly among adjacent canopy-density classes such as open-to-moderate and dense-to-moderate transitions. Spatial changes were distributed across riparian, interior, and peripheral zones. Because 2016 used Level-1C top-of-atmosphere data and 2024 used Level-2A surface-reflectance products, interannual differences should be interpreted as changes in mapped canopy-density classes rather than precise biophysical changes in canopy structure. The framework provides a replicable approach for seasonal forest monitoring and spatially targeted conservation planning.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringForestsSeasonsTreesConservation of Natural ResourcesIndiaRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID42905757
PMCPMC13686517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.