ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Tending The Garden: What organic youth peer support can teach us about building systems that care.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Youth peer support (YPS) is an evidence-based model of care in which young people with lived experience (YPWLE) provide recovery-oriented support to peers navigating similar challenges. On many college campuses this work already happens informally, without training, compensation, or institutional recognition. This narrative essay examines The Garden, a unit of a student mentor-mentee program at the University of California, San Diego, that organically evolved into de facto YPS, providing students mutual aid spanning acute crisis, identity formation, and navigation of the hidden curriculum of higher education. Drawing on first-person accounts, we show that The Garden often operated in place of institutional mental health and advising systems, providing immediate, person-centered support grounded in shared lived experience and human rights. A competency mapping across these accounts demonstrates that The Garden consistently reflected practices the YPS literature identifies as central and effective. We argue that higher education largely lacks both the infrastructure and the institutional power reflexivity to recognize, train, and sustain this labor, manufacturing an invisible and inequitable burden for students. We call on higher education institutions to meaningfully invest in YPS infrastructure, centering youth leadership and community ownership. When institutions seek to scale YPS without ceding power they risk co-optation, stripping student spaces of the autonomy and trust that make them effective and accessible. Drawing on youth participation scholarship, we distinguish recognition from control and propose recommendations across policy, funding, programming, campus climate, and research to build YPS infrastructure that reflects students' lived realities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.