ArticleJAMA surgery2026
Subtotal Colectomy vs Total Colectomy for Slow-Transit Constipation: 1-Year Outcomes of the STOPS Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05352074 (STOPS Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
STOPS Trial: A Multicentre Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Total Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Subtotal Colectomy With Cecal-rectal Anastomosis for Slow Transit Constipation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceFor patients with slow-transit constipation (STC), total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) remains the standard surgical treatment but is frequently complicated by diarrhea, fecal incontinence, and bowel obstruction. Subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis (SC-CRA) has emerged as a promising alternative; however, recurrence of constipation remains a critical concern. High-quality evidence comparing these 2 procedures is lacking.
objectiveTo compare the 1-year Wexner Constipation Score of patients with STC who underwent SC-CRA vs TC-IRA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis multicenter, open-label, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at 12 tertiary hospitals across 8 provinces in China from April 2022 to April 2025, with 12-month follow-up (final follow-up April 2026). Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older with Rome IV-defined functional constipation, fewer than 1 spontaneous bowel movement per week, and long-term laxative dependence, defined as the regular use of osmotic or stimulant laxatives, or prokinetic agents, at least 3 times weekly for 6 months or longer before enrollment. Of 272 adults assessed, 252 were randomized. These data were analyzed from March 2025 to March 2026.
interventionsParticipants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either SC-CRA or TC-IRA. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the Wexner Constipation Score (WCS) at 12 months, with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.32 points. Secondary outcomes included fecal incontinence, morbidity, quality of life, and patient-reported satisfaction.
resultsA total of 252 participants (mean age, 49.5 years; 221 female [87.7%] and 31 male [12.3%]) were randomized to undergo SC-CRA (n = 126) or TC-IRA (n = 126). At 12 months, adjusted mean (SD) WCS was 7.01 (3.31) in the SC-CRA group and 6.84 (3.68) in the TC-IRA group (adjusted mean difference, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.93 to 1.27), which fell within the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.32 (P = .02 for noninferiority). Early postoperative incontinence at 3 months was less frequent in the SC-CRA group than in the TC-IRA group (8.7% vs 21.4%; risk difference, -12.7%; 95% CI, -21.4% to -4.0%; P = .01). Perioperative morbidity did not differ significantly between groups (10.3% vs 12.7%; risk difference, -2.4%; 95% CI, -10.3% to 5.5%; P = .41), and quality-of-life scores at 12 months were comparable. However, patient-reported satisfaction at 12 months favored the TC-IRA group (97.5% vs 95.8%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial among patients with refractory STC, SC-CRA was noninferior to TC-IRA with respect to the WCS at 12 months, but patient-reported satisfaction at 1 year was higher in the TC-IRA group. Longer-term follow-up is needed.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05352074.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.