Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905730›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2026

Subtotal Colectomy vs Total Colectomy for Slow-Transit Constipation: 1-Year Outcomes of the STOPS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Man Guo, Fan Li, Fan Bu, Zhe Cui, Haibo Lan, Ling Ni, Feng Gao, Yongbing Wang, Jianping Zhou, Tao Fu and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05352074 (STOPS Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05352074 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

STOPS Trial: A Multicentre Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Total Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Subtotal Colectomy With Cecal-rectal Anastomosis for Slow Transit Constipation

TypeinterventionalSponsorThird Military Medical UniversityRan2022 to 2028Enrolled252ConditionsSlow Transit Constipation, SurgeryArmsTotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, Subtotal colectomy with cecal-rectal anastomosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Man GuoDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Fan LiDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Fan BuDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Zhe CuiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Haibo LanChengdu Anorectal Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Ling NiResearch Institute of General Surgery, General Hospital of the Eastern Theater Command of the PLA, Nanjing, China.
Feng GaoDepartment of Colorectum, the 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.
Yongbing WangDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jianping ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Tao FuDepartment of General Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Shandong, China.
Weicheng LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Dongbo XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xin LiuChengdu Anorectal Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Hua GaoDepartment of Colorectum, the 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.
Bin HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li WangDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Lin ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China.
Miao WuDepartment of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Sichuan, China.
Congqing JiangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Jun JiangResearch Institute of General Surgery, General Hospital of the Eastern Theater Command of the PLA, Nanjing, China.
Wenjing GongDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Weidong TongDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
STOPS Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceFor patients with slow-transit constipation (STC), total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) remains the standard surgical treatment but is frequently complicated by diarrhea, fecal incontinence, and bowel obstruction. Subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis (SC-CRA) has emerged as a promising alternative; however, recurrence of constipation remains a critical concern. High-quality evidence comparing these 2 procedures is lacking.

objectiveTo compare the 1-year Wexner Constipation Score of patients with STC who underwent SC-CRA vs TC-IRA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis multicenter, open-label, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at 12 tertiary hospitals across 8 provinces in China from April 2022 to April 2025, with 12-month follow-up (final follow-up April 2026). Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older with Rome IV-defined functional constipation, fewer than 1 spontaneous bowel movement per week, and long-term laxative dependence, defined as the regular use of osmotic or stimulant laxatives, or prokinetic agents, at least 3 times weekly for 6 months or longer before enrollment. Of 272 adults assessed, 252 were randomized. These data were analyzed from March 2025 to March 2026.

interventionsParticipants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either SC-CRA or TC-IRA. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the Wexner Constipation Score (WCS) at 12 months, with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.32 points. Secondary outcomes included fecal incontinence, morbidity, quality of life, and patient-reported satisfaction.

resultsA total of 252 participants (mean age, 49.5 years; 221 female [87.7%] and 31 male [12.3%]) were randomized to undergo SC-CRA (n = 126) or TC-IRA (n = 126). At 12 months, adjusted mean (SD) WCS was 7.01 (3.31) in the SC-CRA group and 6.84 (3.68) in the TC-IRA group (adjusted mean difference, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.93 to 1.27), which fell within the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.32 (P = .02 for noninferiority). Early postoperative incontinence at 3 months was less frequent in the SC-CRA group than in the TC-IRA group (8.7% vs 21.4%; risk difference, -12.7%; 95% CI, -21.4% to -4.0%; P = .01). Perioperative morbidity did not differ significantly between groups (10.3% vs 12.7%; risk difference, -2.4%; 95% CI, -10.3% to 5.5%; P = .41), and quality-of-life scores at 12 months were comparable. However, patient-reported satisfaction at 12 months favored the TC-IRA group (97.5% vs 95.8%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial among patients with refractory STC, SC-CRA was noninferior to TC-IRA with respect to the WCS at 12 months, but patient-reported satisfaction at 1 year was higher in the TC-IRA group. Longer-term follow-up is needed.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05352074.

Identifiers

PMID42905730
PMCPMC13688208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.