ArticlePloS one2026
Developing a systems-based programme theory for reducing night-time interactive electronic device use and improving sleep among adolescents.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent night-time use of interactive electronic devices (IEDs) is increasingly linked to poor sleep, mental health challenges, and reduced academic performance. However, existing interventions often overlook the complex systems shaping these behaviours. This study presents a first-of-its-kind systems-based programme theory for CLOCK OFF - a peer influence intervention aimed at reducing night-time IED use and improving adolescent sleep - created through novel participatory mapping activities and analyses, which involved adolescents, parents and teachers.
methodsWe conducted five online participatory workshops with adolescents (aged 11-14 years), parents, and teachers across four United Kingdom schools, supported by desk-based research. Workshop activities were facilitated using StickyStudio software. Causal loop diagramming was used to identify system components and feedback loops influencing adolescent IED use and sleep. Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) were iteratively built using Kumu software, refined and validated through stakeholder input and network analysis. The final CLD informed the development of a systems-based programme theory.
resultsThirty participants (23 adolescents, 7 adults) contributed to the systems mapping process. The final CLD comprised 68 factors (i.e., causal influences of night-time IED use) and 131 connections between these factors, spanning behavioural, educational, psychological, physiological, social, and technological domains. CLOCK OFF-related mechanisms were represented across a large proportion of the system's identified feedback structures. The programme theory diagram included 72 factors and 147 feedback loops, grouped into five subsystems. These subsystems highlighted the dynamic interplay between enjoyment, overstimulation, fear of missing out (FOMO), emotional regulation, and educational stress.
conclusionsParticipatory systems mapping with adolescents is a feasible and valuable method for surfacing complex behavioural drivers and informing intervention design. CLOCK OFF's systems-based programme theory offers a novel approach for understanding and addressing adolescent night-time IED use and sleep disruption. Findings support the need for multi-actor and peer-led, multi-level interventions embedded within broader systemic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.