Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905637›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Attachment, grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, interpersonal competence, and problematic social media use: A latent profile analysis.

Chris A Bjornsen, Allen G Harbaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chris A BjornsenDepartment of Psychology, Longwood University, Farmville, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5923-5929
Allen G HarbaughDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Longwood University, Farmville, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1571-5052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a cross-sectional study we examined associations between attachment anxiety and avoidance, grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, interpersonal competence, and problematic social media use (PSMU) in order to enhance the understanding of the characteristics that may contribute to PSMU. Participants (N = 555) were recruited from social media and crowdsourcing apps and completed a self-report online questionnaire. Correlations between variables generally supported previous findings, with the exceptions of the negative association between grandiose narcissism and attachment avoidance, and the non-significant association between grandiose narcissism and PSMU. Latent profile analysis (LPA) produced four separate profiles distinguished by levels of attachment anxiety and avoidance characteristic of the secure, avoidant, anxious, and fearful attachment styles. The four profiles were also distinguished by unique combinations of grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, and interpersonal competence, and suggest differences between the anxious and fearful attachment styles that have been overlooked in previous studies. We validated the LPA results by comparing mean PSMU scores among the four profiles, revealing statistically significant differences between all four profiles. Securely attached participants reported the lowest level of PSMU, with increasing levels of PSMU reported by avoidant, anxious, and fearful participants.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsNarcissismObject AttachmentSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42905637
PMCPMC13686506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.