ArticlePloS one2026
Investigating the role of mental health and lifestyle behaviours in the risk of adolescent suicidal behaviours through machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuicidal behaviors among adolescents are a serious global public health concern and are closely linked to both mental health and everyday lifestyle behaviors. Suicidal ideation, planning, and attempts lie along a spectrum of increasing severity. However, how psychological distress and health-related behaviors interact to influence suicide risk is complex and not yet fully understood. This study aimed to identify key mental health and lifestyle factors associated with different stages of adolescent suicidal behaviors using interpretable machine learning methods.
methodsData were obtained from the 2021 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBS), a nationally representative survey of U.S. high school students. After data cleaning and multiple imputation, 16,946 adolescents aged 14-18 years were included in the analysis. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models were developed to predict suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and related metrics. Feature importance was examined using gain-based measures, while SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and partial dependence plots were used to explore the direction, strength, and nonlinear effects of key predictors.
resultsAll three XGBoost models showed satisfactory predictive performance. Mental health factors, particularly persistent feelings of sadness and self-rated mental health, were the strongest predictors across all stages of suicidal behaviors. Lifestyle behaviors, including sleep duration, physical activity, diet, screen time, and substance use, also contributed meaningfully to risk prediction, although their relative importance differed by outcome. SHAP analyses indicated that greater sadness and poorer mental health were strongly associated with higher suicide risk, whereas adequate sleep and higher levels of physical activity were associated with lower predicted risk. Substance use, including alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use, played an important role in predicting suicide attempts than suicidal ideation or planning. Partial dependence analyses showed nonlinear and threshold effects, especially for sadness, mental health status, and sleep duration.
conclusionMental health factors, especially persistent sadness and overall psychological well-being, were among the most prominent factors associated with suicidal behaviors among adolescents, while lifestyle behaviors showed important and stage-specific associations. Interpretable machine learning approaches help identify complex and nonlinear patterns associated with adolescent suicide risk and offer valuable insights to guide targeted, evidence-based prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.