Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905611›Full record

ArticleGlia2026

A Müller Glia-Retinal Pigment Epithelium Apical Network Surrounding Cone Outer Segments in Fish and Mouse.

Maria Sharkova, Michael Housset, Samantha Boudreau, Chavy Dworkind, Sara Amidian, Michel Cayouette, Jennifer C Hocking

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria SharkovaDivision of Anatomy, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4980-4811
Michael HoussetCellular Neurobiology Research Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3892-5696
Samantha BoudreauCellular Neurobiology Research Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Chavy DworkindDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sara AmidianCell Imaging Core, B-120 Katz Group Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Michel CayouetteCellular Neurobiology Research Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-9048
Jennifer C HockingDivision of Anatomy, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-2081

Funding

Canada Research Chairs ProgramCIHR PJT 203695Edmonton Civic Employees Charitable Assistance FundIRCM FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2018-05756Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2025-05687Vision Sciences Research NetworkWomen and Children's Health Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homeostasis of the vertebrate retina critically depends on two non-neuronal cell populations, Müller glia and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Their opposing apical surfaces delineate the subretinal space, a specialized extracellular compartment housing the light-detecting outer segments of photoreceptors. Although the individual interactions between these supporting cells and photoreceptors have been extensively characterized, Müller glia and the RPE have long been presumed to remain physically separate in the healthy retina. Here, we challenge this assumption and present a revised model of the subretinal space architecture based on detailed FIB-SEM and confocal microscopy imaging of the zebrafish and mouse outer retina. We demonstrate that both Müller glia and the RPE extend long apical processes that not only contact one another but also collectively ensheath cone outer segments, forming a previously unrecognized tripartite interface. These contact regions are highly elaborated in fish and, while comparatively sparser, are still present in mouse. Developmentally, the growth and interdigitation of Müller glial and RPE apical processes follow the emergence of the outer segment in both species and, in mouse, coincides with the onset of visual function. Although glial-RPE interactions are enriched at cone-associated sites, their presence is not strictly dependent on cone localization in either species, suggesting they represent a fundamental feature of the vertebrate subretinal space. Together, these findings revise our understanding of the subretinal space cytoarchitecture and reveal a previously unappreciated structural interaction between Müller glia, RPE, and photoreceptors that is conserved across vertebrate species.

Indexed as

Ependymoglial CellsRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Pigment EpitheliumAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalZebrafishFIB‐SEMMüller gliaphotoreceptorRPEsubretinal space

Identifiers

PMID42905611
PMCPMC13686382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.