ArticleNursing open2026
Licensed Practical Nurses' Gerontological Nursing Competence: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe study aimed to describe and explain the self-assessed gerontological nursing competence of licensed practical nurses (LPNs) in one wellbeing services county of Finland and explore the factors relating to it.
designA descriptive cross-sectional design was used in this study.
methodsData were collected in one Finnish wellbeing services county between March and April 2023 using the GeroNursingCom instrument, comprising 53 items covering 11 competence factors and four additional documentation-related questions. The questionnaire was distributed to nursing professionals (n = 2916), including registered nurses and licensed practical nurses, across three organizations. The present study focuses on licensed practical nurses (n = 493). Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
resultsLPNs evaluated their total gerontological self-assessed competencies as very good or good. The strongest competence dimensions were in encountering and interacting, considering a safe living environment and supporting functional capacity. According to the results, only the age of the LPNs was statistically significant for the total self-assessed competence in gerontological nursing. The strongest total competence was found in those who were under 40 years of age and the weakest in those who were 50 years of age or older.
conclusionLPNs reported good to very good self-assessed total gerontological nursing competence. Younger LPNs reported significantly higher overall competence than older LPNs, highlighting the importance of continuous competence development throughout the career. IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The results show that LPNs' gerontological self-assessed nursing competence is generally good or very good; however, there are skill gaps in certain areas. Gerontological nursing competence is highest among LPNs under 40 and those with extensive experience in older people's care. These findings can help LPNs and organizations focus on developing gerontological nursing competencies to address skill gaps and improve the quality of care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.