ArticleJournal of food science2026
When Food Safety Goes Viral: The Influence of the Documentary Poisoned on Trust in Food Supply Chain Actors and Food Risk Perceptions Among Young Adult College Students in Indiana.
Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As foodborne illnesses pose a significant public health concern in the United States, the rise of streaming platforms broadens audiences' exposure to food safety documentary films. This investigation examines how the documentary Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food shapes young adults' perceptions, attitudes, and trust in the food supply chain among undergraduate students at one university in Indiana enrolled in food science (Study 1, n = 19) and nonfood science programs (Study 2, n = 59). An explanatory mixed-methods design combined surveys at three time points with a focus group discussion. Surveys assessed perceptions of food safety importance and confidence in food supply actors using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, while focus group transcripts were analyzed thematically. Participants reported strong emotional responses, including fear, frustration, and distrust toward the food industry and regulatory bodies, while describing the documentary as informative and effective in raising awareness about foodborne illness risks and the importance of food safety practices. Differences emerged by educational background, with food science majors demonstrating more critical engagement, whereas some nonfood science participants reported intentions to adopt risky food-handling practices, such as washing raw poultry. Confidence in food supply chain actors declined significantly after viewing. At 9-day follow-up, food science students regained trust, while nonfood science students showed recovery only toward consumer-facing actors and food they prepared themselves. These findings suggest that emotionally compelling documentaries can increase food safety awareness and engagement while reducing trust and unintentionally reinforcing unsafe practices. Rather than serving as educational tools, such documentaries offer valuable lessons for improving transparent, accurate, and balanced food safety communication. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This research offers food industry, government agencies, educators, and media creators with insight into how the documentary Poisoned can influence young adults' in college perceptions and responses to food safety issues. Since documentaries are widely available and can reach broad audiences, findings highlight the importance of proactive, transparent, and collaborative communication, helping audience understand how the food system works, how food safety hazards are addressed, and what can be done in the kitchen to reduce risks. Cross-sector collaboration that combines engaging storytelling with reliable educational content may improve public understanding, strengthen confidence in the food system, and encourage safer food-handling practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.