ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2026
Development of an artificial intelligence algorithm for automated detection of cardiovascular intervention-related complications.
Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI in daily cardiology and structured multidisciplinary care.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntervention-related complications negatively affect healthcare quality and costs. Complication registration and reporting play an important role in the improvement of healthcare outcomes but are time-consuming and hampered by under-reporting.
methodsWe developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-aided tool that extracts specific complications, including bleeding, tamponade, CVA and phrenic paralysis, from electronic healthcare records of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Both structured and unstructured data were used, along with additional signals identified through machine learning. The model was optimized to achieve high sensitivity.
resultsElectronic records of 6,564 patients undergoing PVI, PTCA, and TAVI, performed at our hospital from 2017-2022, were used. The final model detected the various complications with a sensitivity between 94.4 and 100%, while specificity ranged from 99.4-100%. This resulted in positive predictive values ranging from 47.5-81%, with F‑scores varying between 0.64-0.87.
conclusionWe developed an AI-driven tool capable of automatically detecting complications following cardiac interventions from patient healthcare records, achieving a very high sensitivity. Our tool enables registration of complications while significantly reducing administrative burden on the healthcare providers and data managers. It provides valuable and high-quality input for improvement cycles, thereby enhancing patient safety and healthcare quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42905390What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.