ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2026
Patient and Physician Perspectives on Oral Treatment in Ophthalmology.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal (IVT) therapy injections are routinely used to treat retinal diseases, including diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD [nAMD]). Despite their robust efficacy, IVTs may not be effective for all patients and can impact patient quality of life due to the need for frequent injections, ocular adverse events (AEs), and challenges around the injection itself. Oral therapy enabling fewer injections may have a beneficial impact on patients' lives. Several are currently in development for retinal diseases, and existing data suggest that patients would prefer oral to injectable therapies. However, challenges around this possible paradigm shift include potential systemic AEs, adherence and polypharmacy issues, and difficulties specifically targeting the eye with oral therapy. Additionally, it is unclear which healthcare professionals (HCPs) will be prescribers and how healthcare systems will adapt to provide oral therapy to patients. As oral treatment would be a new therapeutic modality for retinal disease, patient perspective studies on its use in this setting are limited. This commentary provides the perspectives of patient authors living with retinal diseases and those of expert clinicians involved in retinal disease management. We explore the potential future role for oral therapy in retinal disease alongside IVT, including possible barriers to uptake, a review of relevant existing literature, and lessons from oncology where a paradigm shift from parenteral to oral therapy has already happened. While challenges will arise for the introduction of new oral therapies, the benefits may be considerable, and some potential barriers may be less significant than the literature suggests. We hope this article will inform and educate patients and physicians about potential benefits and challenges for oral therapy in retinal disease and facilitate discussion around how best to support patients with the introduction of these novel therapies.Video abstract available for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42905386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.