ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026
Sonographic Evaluation of Plantar Hindfoot Pain in Athletes.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo provide an anatomy-based review of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) in the evaluation of plantar hindfoot pain in athletes. This review summarizes normal sonographic anatomy, characteristic findings, diagnostic utility, and limitations for plantar fascia, heel fat pad, calcaneal, peripheral nerve, vascular, and foreign-body pathology. It also examines how US findings should be integrated with the history and physical examination in athletes. RECENT
findingsRecent studies support high-resolution, dynamic US as a useful imaging modality for plantar hindfoot pain. US enables real-time assessment, contralateral comparison, sonopalpation, and evaluation during dynamic maneuvers. Emerging literature has further characterized the layered structure and loading behavior of the heel fat pad, dynamic sonographic findings of fat pad fracture and subluxation, and assessment of peripheral nerve entrapment. Recent studies also demonstrate that plantar fascia, heel fat pad, and other hindfoot abnormalities are prevalent in asymptomatic athletes. Although sonographic abnormalities may be associated with future time-loss injury, their low positive predictive value limits their role as a screening tool. MRI remains important when evaluating suspected calcaneal stress injury, marrow pathology, or complex soft-tissue disease. US is an accessible and valuable modality for the assessment of plantar heel pain in athletes. A structured, symptom-driven examination may improve diagnostic precision and identify alternative or coexisting pathology. Sonographic findings should be correlated with symptom location, physical examination, and sonopalpatory pain, particularly because structural abnormalities are common in asymptomatic athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.