ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
Population-specific association and risk discrimination utility of the cardiometabolic index for prevalent hypertension-diabetes comorbidity: insights from CHARLS and NHANES.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The comorbidity of cardiometabolic diseases, such as hypertension and diabetes, is increasingly prevalent worldwide, particularly among middle-aged and elderly populations. The cardiometabolic index (CMI), a novel composite biomarker integrating features of dyslipidemia and abdominal obesity, has emerged as a potential indicator. However, its association with prevalent hypertension-diabetes comorbidity and its risk discrimination utility across Chinese and American populations remain insufficiently investigated. This investigation utilized data from CHARLS and NHANES, encompassing 12,261 Chinese and 1,329 American participants. Multivariable logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were employed to evaluate the association and dose-response relationship between CMI and prevalent hypertension-diabetes comorbidity. Machine learning models were constructed to evaluate risk discrimination performance, including LightGBM, GBM, and CatBoost. Mediation analysis was further conducted to assess the potential mediating role of body mass index (BMI) in the association between CMI and the outcome. Elevated CMI was significantly associated with an increased risk of hypertension-diabetes comorbidity (CHARLS: OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 2.00-2.34; NHANES: OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.48-2.69). RCS analysis revealed a marked nonlinear association within the Chinese cohort (threshold effect, P-nonlinear < 0.001), contrasting with a more linear relationship in the American population (P-nonlinear = 0.764). Among the machine learning models, LightGBM and GBM demonstrated superior risk discrimination performance (CHARLS AUC = 0.841; NHANES AUC = 0.948). Mediation analysis indicated that BMI exerted a significant partial mediating effect, accounting for 32.90% and 43.32% of the total association in the Chinese and American cohorts, respectively. CMI was independently associated with prevalent hypertension-diabetes comorbidity, with notable population-specific differences in association patterns. Machine learning models incorporating CMI showed favorable risk discrimination performance. The partial mediation effect of BMI underscores the critical importance of adiposity management in mitigating cardiometabolic risk. This study provides a novel theoretical framework and methodological support for cross-population cardiometabolic health assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.