Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905363›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026

Population-specific association and risk discrimination utility of the cardiometabolic index for prevalent hypertension-diabetes comorbidity: insights from CHARLS and NHANES.

Ting You, Jia Xu, Jukun Liu, Linhui Jiang, Zhihao Deng, Yinglan Liu, Hailong Qiu, Jia Zhou, Caixia Sun, Tianyu Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ting YouSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
Jia XuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Jukun LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Linhui JiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Zhihao DengDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Yinglan LiuThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China.
Hailong QiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Jia ZhouThe First Affiliated Hospital, Department of Emergency, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan421001, China.
Caixia SunThe First Affiliated Hospital, Department of Emergency, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan421001, China.
Tianyu ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Wenkai ZhouDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China. zhouwenkai@gdph.org.cn.
Dengfeng ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China. qiyotoho@smu.edu.cn.
Jian ZhuangSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China. zhuangjian5413@163.com.

Funding

the Health and Medical Research Project of Hunan Province No. 20257033the Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center for Obesity-Related Diseases No. 2023SK4052the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province No. 2019B020230003the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82370353the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province No. 2025JJ60723the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province No. 2025JJ81054the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province No. 2025JJ81070the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province No. 2020B1111170011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comorbidity of cardiometabolic diseases, such as hypertension and diabetes, is increasingly prevalent worldwide, particularly among middle-aged and elderly populations. The cardiometabolic index (CMI), a novel composite biomarker integrating features of dyslipidemia and abdominal obesity, has emerged as a potential indicator. However, its association with prevalent hypertension-diabetes comorbidity and its risk discrimination utility across Chinese and American populations remain insufficiently investigated. This investigation utilized data from CHARLS and NHANES, encompassing 12,261 Chinese and 1,329 American participants. Multivariable logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were employed to evaluate the association and dose-response relationship between CMI and prevalent hypertension-diabetes comorbidity. Machine learning models were constructed to evaluate risk discrimination performance, including LightGBM, GBM, and CatBoost. Mediation analysis was further conducted to assess the potential mediating role of body mass index (BMI) in the association between CMI and the outcome. Elevated CMI was significantly associated with an increased risk of hypertension-diabetes comorbidity (CHARLS: OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 2.00-2.34; NHANES: OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.48-2.69). RCS analysis revealed a marked nonlinear association within the Chinese cohort (threshold effect, P-nonlinear < 0.001), contrasting with a more linear relationship in the American population (P-nonlinear = 0.764). Among the machine learning models, LightGBM and GBM demonstrated superior risk discrimination performance (CHARLS AUC = 0.841; NHANES AUC = 0.948). Mediation analysis indicated that BMI exerted a significant partial mediating effect, accounting for 32.90% and 43.32% of the total association in the Chinese and American cohorts, respectively. CMI was independently associated with prevalent hypertension-diabetes comorbidity, with notable population-specific differences in association patterns. Machine learning models incorporating CMI showed favorable risk discrimination performance. The partial mediation effect of BMI underscores the critical importance of adiposity management in mitigating cardiometabolic risk. This study provides a novel theoretical framework and methodological support for cross-population cardiometabolic health assessment.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHypertensionAdultAgedBody Mass IndexBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsChinaComorbidityFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRisk AssessmentCardiometabolic IndexComorbidityDiabetes MellitusHypertensionMachine LearningMediation Analysis

Identifiers

PMID42905363
PMCPMC13687134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.