ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026
Diagnostic performance of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the diagnosis of human and cat sporotrichosis in two highly endemic areas in Brazil: insights from a real-world, field-based evaluation.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sporotrichosis is a subacute to chronic mycosis of major public health relevance in endemic regions, affecting both humans and animals, particularly cats. Rapid and accessible diagnostic tools are urgently needed to improve case detection and disease surveillance. Thus, this study aimed to validate a previously described loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the diagnosis of sporotrichosis in clinical samples from humans and cats obtained in two highly endemic areas in Brazil. We conducted an observational study including human patients and cats with suspected sporotrichosis. Analytical sensitivity and specificity were initially assessed using reference strains of Sporothrix spp. The diagnostic performance of the LAMP assay was then evaluated in clinical samples at different incubation times and compared with culture results. Sensitivity, specificity, and additional diagnostic parameters were calculated separately for human and cat cases. The LAMP assay was able to detect the three major Sporothrix species associated with sporotrichosis, with higher analytical sensitivity for S. brasiliensis. However, when applied to human clinical samples, the assay showed limited sensitivity and specificity, particularly at earlier incubation times, resulting in poor overall diagnostic performance. In contrast, performance in cat samples was comparatively higher but still affected by false-positive and false-negative results. Despite promising analytical characteristics and previous success in experimental models, this LAMP protocol demonstrated limited diagnostic utility for human and cat sporotrichosis under real-world clinical conditions, highlighting the need for further optimization and rigorous clinical validation before implementation in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.