Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905351›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026

Diagnostic performance of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the diagnosis of human and cat sporotrichosis in two highly endemic areas in Brazil: insights from a real-world, field-based evaluation.

Rodrigo Almeida-Paes, Lívia Silveira Munhoz, Susana Ruiz Mendoza, Vanice Rodrigues Poester, Vanessa Brito de Souza Rabello, Helena Schirmer, Márlon Grégori Flôres Custódio, Vanessa Suñé Mattevi, Dayvison Francis Saraiva Freitas, Melissa Orzechowski Xavier and 2 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rodrigo Almeida-PaesFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Laboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. rodrigo.paes@ini.fiocruz.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6639-6058
Lívia Silveira MunhozFaculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Micologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, RS, Rio Grande, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3538-5006
Susana Ruiz MendozaFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Laboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0153-435X
Vanice Rodrigues PoesterFaculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Micologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, RS, Rio Grande, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7121-3861
Vanessa Brito de Souza RabelloFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Laboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Helena SchirmerUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8979-9343
Márlon Grégori Flôres CustódioVice-Direção de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5700-1923
Vanessa Suñé MatteviUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2697-4909
Dayvison Francis Saraiva FreitasFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Dermatologia Infecciosa, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-2438
Melissa Orzechowski XavierFaculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Micologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, RS, Rio Grande, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-0080
Rosely Maria Zancopé-OliveiraFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Laboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7619-1921
Cecília Bittencourt SeveroUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0321-4330

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 405.653/2021-2Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 200.423/2026Inova Fiocruz PRES-008-FIO-22-2-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sporotrichosis is a subacute to chronic mycosis of major public health relevance in endemic regions, affecting both humans and animals, particularly cats. Rapid and accessible diagnostic tools are urgently needed to improve case detection and disease surveillance. Thus, this study aimed to validate a previously described loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the diagnosis of sporotrichosis in clinical samples from humans and cats obtained in two highly endemic areas in Brazil. We conducted an observational study including human patients and cats with suspected sporotrichosis. Analytical sensitivity and specificity were initially assessed using reference strains of Sporothrix spp. The diagnostic performance of the LAMP assay was then evaluated in clinical samples at different incubation times and compared with culture results. Sensitivity, specificity, and additional diagnostic parameters were calculated separately for human and cat cases. The LAMP assay was able to detect the three major Sporothrix species associated with sporotrichosis, with higher analytical sensitivity for S. brasiliensis. However, when applied to human clinical samples, the assay showed limited sensitivity and specificity, particularly at earlier incubation times, resulting in poor overall diagnostic performance. In contrast, performance in cat samples was comparatively higher but still affected by false-positive and false-negative results. Despite promising analytical characteristics and previous success in experimental models, this LAMP protocol demonstrated limited diagnostic utility for human and cat sporotrichosis under real-world clinical conditions, highlighting the need for further optimization and rigorous clinical validation before implementation in routine practice.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSporothrixSporotrichosisAnimalsBrazilCatsEndemic DiseasesHumansSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID42905351
PMCPMC13687495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.