Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905302›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2026

Investigating the effects of acute caffeine administration on visual search, resistance to distraction, and attentional learning.

Sojung Youn, Jenna Glotfelty, Ming-Ray Liao, Brian A Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sojung YounDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. syoun@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9160-2078
Jenna GlotfeltyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Ming-Ray LiaoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Brian A AndersonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to selectively attend to task-relevant information is central to the performance of a variety of cognitive tasks. Accessible and low-risk pharmacological interventions hold promise with respect to maximizing cognitive performance and augmenting attentional abilities. Acute administration of caffeine reflects one such pharmacological intervention, which has been shown to improve some measures of attention. The effects of caffeine on the efficiency of attentional selection during visual search and the degree to which such efficiency can improve with learning have not been investigated, which we tested here. In a single-blind between-subjects design, participants received either 200 mg of caffeine or placebo and completed visual search tasks in which the target (Experiment 1) and a physically salient distractor (Experiment 2) were more likely to be rendered in a particular color. A third task was also implemented to measure the trade-off between physical and attentional effort under the effect of caffeine (Experiment 3). The efficiency of target selection (Experiment 1) and distractor rejection (Experiment 2) were strongly influenced by color-based statistical learning. Participants were sensitive to the trade-off between physical and attentional effort (Experiment 3). However, none of these measures were influenced by caffeine. A beneficial effect of caffeine was observed on the speed of target recognition in Experiment 1 only. Our findings suggest a limited role for the influence of caffeine on the attention system.

Indexed as

AttentionCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsLearningPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAdultCognitive EnhancementFemaleHumansMaleSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsCaffeineSelective attentionStatistical learningVisual search

Identifiers

PMID42905302
PMCPMC13687482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.