ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Changes in peripheral sensory afference do not alter predictive motor planning: evidence from carpal tunnel syndrome.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticipatory control organises motor output prior to predictable perturbations and is expressed in multi-digit tasks as anticipatory synergy adjustments (ASAs), which coordinate digit forces before movement onset. Whether such feedforward coordination depends on peripheral sensory input remains unclear. Carpal tunnel syndrome provides a model of altered median nerve afference with within-subject restoration following surgical decompression. We quantified ASA onset and amplitude in eleven individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome performing a multi-finger grasp-and-release task before and three weeks after decompression surgery. Postoperatively, sensory function improved, and total grip force decreased significantly across task phases, indicating more efficient force regulation. In contrast, ASA onset timing and amplitude were unchanged. Equivalence testing confirmed that pre- and post-operative ASA measures fell within predefined bounds of practical equivalence. These findings demonstrate a central-peripheral dissociation: feedback-mediated grip force scaling is sensory-dependent and rapidly recalibrates following afferent restoration, whereas feedforward synergy coordination remains stable despite months of degraded peripheral input. The preserved ASA suggests that central motor planning circuits maintain anticipatory coordination through efferent copy or cerebellar-mediated internal models that do not require continuous peripheral recalibration. This resilience may reflect the brain's ability to maintain predictive motor planning despite chronic sensory degradation, with implications for understanding compensatory mechanisms in peripheral neuropathies and the limits of sensory-dependent motor adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42905281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.