Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905225›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026

An integrated chemical and biomarker approach using Ucides cordatus (Crustacea; Decapoda) to assess trace element contamination and its biological impacts across two Amazonian estuaries.

Luciana Barros Oliveira, Lina Clara Gayoso E Almendra Ibiapina Moreno, Suelen Rosana Sampaio de Oliveira, Laércio Dos Anjos Benjamin, Débora Batista Pinheiro-Sousa, Gerson Dos Santos Protázio, Alana Lislea de Sousa, Thales Passos Andrade, Eliane Braga Ribeiro, Jonatas da Silva Castro and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Luciana Barros OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (REDE BIONORTE), State University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-310, Brazil. lucianaoliveira@proinfra.uema.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-584X
Lina Clara Gayoso E Almendra Ibiapina MorenoPostgraduate Program in Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation, State University of Maranhão, Paulo VI Campus, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-970, Brazil.
Suelen Rosana Sampaio de OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (REDE BIONORTE), State University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-310, Brazil.
Laércio Dos Anjos BenjaminDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, CEP 36570-000, Brazil.
Débora Batista Pinheiro-SousaCoordination of the Environmental Engineering Program, Federal University of Maranhão, Balsas, MA, CEP 65800-000, Brazil.
Gerson Dos Santos ProtázioPostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (REDE BIONORTE), State University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-310, Brazil.
Alana Lislea de SousaPostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (REDE BIONORTE), State University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-310, Brazil.
Thales Passos AndradePostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (REDE BIONORTE), State University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-310, Brazil.
Eliane Braga RibeiroPostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (REDE BIONORTE), State University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-310, Brazil.
Jonatas da Silva CastroDepartment of Fisheries Engineering, Federal University of Maranhão, Pinheiro, MA, CEP 65200-000, Brazil.
Gustavo Henrique Rodrigues Vale de MacedoPostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (REDE BIONORTE), State University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-310, Brazil.
Luan Jonatas da Silva FerreiraPostgraduate Program in Agriculture and Environment, State University of Maranhão, Paulo VI Campus, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-970, Brazil.
Verônica Maria OliveiraDepartmen of Biology, State University of Maranhão, Paulo VI Campus, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-970, Brazil.
Débora Martins Silva SantosDepartmen of Biology, State University of Maranhão, Paulo VI Campus, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-970, Brazil.
Sandra Fernanda Loureiro de Castro NunesDepartmen of Biology, State University of Maranhão, Paulo VI Campus, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-970, Brazil.
Raimunda Nonata Fortes Carvalho NetaDepartmen of Biology, State University of Maranhão, Paulo VI Campus, São Luís, MA, CEP 65055-970, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, an integrated chemical and biomarker approach was applied using the mangrove crab Ucides cordatus to assess trace element contamination and its biological impacts across two distinct Amazonian estuaries. Crabs were collected from São José Bay (A1-minimally impacted) and São Marcos Bay (A2-impacted by port activities) on the Amazon coast of Brazil. Simultaneously with crab sampling, physicochemical parameters and trace element levels in sediment and water samples were assessed. Biometric measurements included cephalothorax length and width, cheliped propodus length and width, movable finger length and width, and total weight. Two biomarkers, genotoxic responses (micronuclei) and histopathological lesions (gills and liver hepatopancreas), were measured. Abiotic parameters, such as pH, dissolved oxygen, and salinity, were similar between the two study areas (A1 and A2). However, the concentrations of trace elements (Zn, Fe, Al, and Mn) in the water were increased in A2. Biometric data revealed that crabs from A2 were significantly smaller and lighter (p < 0.05) than those from A1. Gill lesions (marginal canal deformation, pillar cell rupture, and necrosis) were frequently observed in crabs from both sites, with a higher prevalence in A2. Hepatopancreas histological alterations (e.g., necrosis) were significantly more common in crabs from A2 (p < 0.05). Genotoxic responses, such as pycnotic nuclei, were also significantly more frequent in A2 (p < 0.05). The results demonstrate that Ucides cordatus effectively reflects environmental contamination through measurable histological and genotoxic biomarkers, which is consistent with the chemical evidence of trace element pollution in estuarine environments.

Indexed as

BrachyuraEnvironmental MonitoringTrace ElementsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsBiomarkersBrazilEstuariesBiomarkersTrace ElementsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiomonitoringCrustaceanMaranhãoPort areasSão Marcos Bay

Identifiers

PMID42905225
PMCPMC13687237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.