ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2026
Characterisation and degradation of microplastic by Microbacterium aurantiacum isolated from biofloc in white shrimp aquaculture closed system.
Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study pioneers the investigation of a novel bacteria isolated from the biofloc of a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) for its role as a microplastic degrader. A targeted bioflocculant-producing strain was isolated and identified as Microbacterium aurantiacum (formerly known as Microbacterium chocolatum DSM12507) by phenotypic and genotypic analysis. This strain showed a good flocculation rate (95% in a kaolin test), confirming its capacity as a bioflocculant. To evaluate the performance in the degradation of microplastics (polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS), the Bushnell-Haas (BH) medium with microplastics as carbon source was used. A first screening after 14 days showed clear zones on the agar plates (S1), indicating the release of extracellular enzymes capable of depolymerizing plastic polymers. The results of quantitative gravimetric analysis after 50 days of incubation showed a significant weight loss in all microplastics: 9.2% (PP), 8.9% (PE) and 8.8% (PS), indicating that the microplastic was degraded. This biodegradation was further confirmed by remarkable structural and chemical changes visible on the sample images by spectroscopy analysis. These results suggest that bioflocs from shrimp farming not only represent an unexpected reservoir of bacteria with multiple functions, but can also contribute to environmental control through natural bioremediation. This study has highlighted the identified bioflocculant-producing bacteria, M. aurantiacum as a promising natural agent for the bioremediation of ubiquitous microplastic pollution, transforming a by-product of aquaculture into a potential solution to an environmental crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42905224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.