ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2026
The Landmark Series: Perioperative Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with an increasing burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease-associated HCC in Western populations. In treating HCC, recurrence after curative-intent therapy remains common, creating a compelling rationale for perioperative systemic therapy.
methodsThis Landmark Series review examines the pivotal studies that have shaped the surgical and perioperative management of HCC, tracing the evolution from principles of resectability to contemporary adjuvant and neoadjuvant immune-based strategies.
resultsThe development of perioperative therapy has been defined by both landmark negative trials and emerging evidence of efficacy. The STORM trial demonstrated that sorafenib's activity in advanced HCC did not translate into benefit after resection or ablation. The IMbrave050 trial subsequently demonstrated an early recurrence-free survival advantage with adjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab that was not sustained with longer follow-up evaluation, whereas the KEYNOTE-937 trial failed to demonstrate benefit with adjuvant pembrolizumab. In contrast, early-phase neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor-based studies have demonstrated feasibility and meaningful pathologic responses, and the CARES-009 trial provided the first randomized phase III evidence of improved event-free survival with a perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor-antiangiogenic strategy.
conclusionsPerioperative management of HCC is evolving toward an integrated, multidisciplinary treatment paradigm. Although no broadly applicable adjuvant systemic therapy has been established, emerging perioperative strategies provide proof of concept that systemic therapy may improve outcomes for selected patients. Future progress will depend on biomarker-driven patient selection, molecular residual disease assessment, standardized pathologic response criteria, and clinical trials identifying which patients require perioperative therapy and when treatment should be delivered.
Identifiers
42905198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.