ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2026
Trends in Occupational Heat-Health Research in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Mapping Review.
Review in Current environmental health reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewExtreme heat is increasingly threatening the health of workers worldwide and disproportionately impacting workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This mapping review was conducted to characterize the existing literature and to identify key gaps in field assessments of heat stress impacts on workers in LMICs. RECENT
findingsA total of 210 reports were included in the analysis. Almost two-thirds of included articles reported on studies conducted in lower-middle income countries (65%), with most reports from the South-East Asia Region (40%) and from India (30%), Iran (16%), and China (9%). At-risk populations were underrepresented, with 39% of reports not including any female participants and only 10% specifying migrant status, with wide variation in reporting of additional demographic, occupational, and workplace characteristics. Manufacturing and agriculture were by far the occupations most studied (36% and 33%, respectively). The most common index of heat stress was the wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT), with a report-level average ranging from 17.1 to 38.5 °C, with peaks as high as 54.4 °C. The most commonly reported outcomes were cardiovascular responses (50%) such as heart rate and blood pressure, body temperatures (43%), and self-reported symptoms of heat illness or heat strain (35%). Among all reports, only 9% included some form of intervention to protect workers. This review identifies the key trends and gaps in populations, occupations, and regions evaluated in heat-health research. As emerging technologies facilitate research expansion, this mapping review can guide future efforts to promote comparability of studies, overcome gaps, and protect worker health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.