Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905194›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2026

CT Perfusion in the differential diagnosis of glioblastomas and primary central nervous system lymphomas.

Artem I Batalov, Ramin M Afandiev, Natalia E Zakharova, Alisa V Lebedenko, Eduard L Pogosbekyan, Maria A Ponomareva, Ivan V Chekhonin, Igor N Pronin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Artem I BatalovBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8924-7346
Ramin M AfandievBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6384-7960
Natalia E ZakharovaBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-3613
Alisa V LebedenkoBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation. Lebedenko@nsi.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2441-6436
Eduard L PogosbekyanBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4803-6948
Maria A PonomarevaBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6145-0430
Ivan V ChekhoninBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-2472
Igor N ProninBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-0275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare perfusion parameters of glioblastomas and primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) using CT perfusion (CTP) and to assess the diagnostic performance of this technique for their preoperative differential diagnosis.

methodsThis single-center retrospective study included CTP data from 122 patients (57 with PCNSL and 65 with glioblastoma) examined at our hospital between 2006 and 2026. All diagnoses were histologically verified; no patient received chemotherapy, corticosteroids or radiotherapy prior to CTP. Imaging was performed on a 64-slice Optima 660 scanner (GE Medical Systems) using a prolonged perfusion protocol. Absolute (CBF, CBV, MTT, PS) and normalized (nCBF, nCBV, nMTT, nPS) perfusion parameters were obtained. The Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation and ROC analysis were applied for statistical comparison.

resultsGlioblastomas demonstrated significantly higher CBF and CBV and lower MTT and PS values than PCNSL; the same pattern was observed for the normalized parameters. PS (AUC = 0.93), nPS (AUC = 0.90), nCBF (AUC = 0.91), nCBV (AUC = 0.90), CBF (AUC = 0.88) and CBV (AUC = 0.88) showed the highest diagnostic performance, whereas MTT and nMTT were less informative (AUC = 0.69-0.72).

conclusionCTP is a highly informative non-invasive quantitative imaging tool for the preoperative differentiation of glioblastomas and PCNSL. The inclusion of normalized perfusion parameters improves reproducibility and supports use in routine clinical practice and multicenter studies. CTP can be recommended whenever conventional CT and MRI fail to reliably distinguish these tumors.

Indexed as

CT perfusionDifferential diagnosisGlioblastomaPermeability surfacePrimary CNS lymphomaROC analysis

Identifiers

PMID42905194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.