ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Deep learning-based renal-trauma classification: comparison of two-dimensional convolutional neural network and vision-transformer models on arterial- and venous-phase computed-tomography images.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and accurate detection of renal trauma is essential in emergency medicine. This study aimed to automatically classify renal trauma using 2D convolutional neural network (CNN) and vision transformer (ViT) models on arterial- and venous-phase computed tomography (CT) images. We analyzed CT images from 94 patients, including 47 without renal trauma and 47 with renal trauma (30,951 and 15,086 images, respectively). Arterial- and venous-phase CT images were reconstructed into axial, coronal, and sagittal images, with the renal regions cropped to construct the image datasets. Five pretrained CNN-based and five pretrained ViT-based 2D models were fine-tuned to classify renal trauma, and their performance was evaluated at the slice and patient levels using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. At the slice level, the sagittal Inception-V3 model achieved the highest AUC values of 0.986 for venous-phase and 0.975 for arterial-phase images. At the patient level, the coronal Inception-V3 model achieved the highest AUC values of 0.991 for venous-phase and 0.945 for arterial-phase images. CNN-based models outperformed ViT-based models at both levels, with slice-level mean AUC values of 0.971 and 0.940 for venous-phase and 0.942 and 0.914 for arterial-phase images and patient-level values of 0.947 and 0.928 for venous-phase and 0.914 and 0.886 for arterial-phase images, respectively. The 2D models demonstrated high diagnostic performance for renal trauma, even when using arterial-phase images alone, supporting their potential for rapid decision-making in emergency settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42905191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.