Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905191›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026

Deep learning-based renal-trauma classification: comparison of two-dimensional convolutional neural network and vision-transformer models on arterial- and venous-phase computed-tomography images.

Kazuya Takahashi, Haruyuki Watanabe, Kurumi Hamaguchi, Minori Aoki, Kazuho Saito, Norio Hayashi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kazuya TakahashiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Japanese Red Cross Saitama Hospital, 1-5 Shintoshin, Chuo-ku, Saitama-shi, Saitama, 330-8553, Japan. mr255102@gchs.ac.jp.
Haruyuki WatanabeSchool of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, 323-1 Kamioki-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Kurumi HamaguchiSchool of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, 323-1 Kamioki-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Minori AokiSchool of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, 323-1 Kamioki-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Kazuho SaitoDepartment of Radiological Technology, Saitama City Hospital, 2460 Mimuro, Midori-ku, Saitama-shi, Saitama, 336-8522, Japan.
Norio HayashiSchool of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, 323-1 Kamioki-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and accurate detection of renal trauma is essential in emergency medicine. This study aimed to automatically classify renal trauma using 2D convolutional neural network (CNN) and vision transformer (ViT) models on arterial- and venous-phase computed tomography (CT) images. We analyzed CT images from 94 patients, including 47 without renal trauma and 47 with renal trauma (30,951 and 15,086 images, respectively). Arterial- and venous-phase CT images were reconstructed into axial, coronal, and sagittal images, with the renal regions cropped to construct the image datasets. Five pretrained CNN-based and five pretrained ViT-based 2D models were fine-tuned to classify renal trauma, and their performance was evaluated at the slice and patient levels using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. At the slice level, the sagittal Inception-V3 model achieved the highest AUC values of 0.986 for venous-phase and 0.975 for arterial-phase images. At the patient level, the coronal Inception-V3 model achieved the highest AUC values of 0.991 for venous-phase and 0.945 for arterial-phase images. CNN-based models outperformed ViT-based models at both levels, with slice-level mean AUC values of 0.971 and 0.940 for venous-phase and 0.942 and 0.914 for arterial-phase images and patient-level values of 0.947 and 0.928 for venous-phase and 0.914 and 0.886 for arterial-phase images, respectively. The 2D models demonstrated high diagnostic performance for renal trauma, even when using arterial-phase images alone, supporting their potential for rapid decision-making in emergency settings.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceComputed tomographyConvolutional neural networkEmergency medicineRenal traumaVision transformer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.