ReviewInternational journal of hematology2026
Current perspectives on high-risk genomic profiles in chronic myeloid leukemia: from bench to clinical practice.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by BCR::ABL1 rearrangement, yet its genomic architecture extends well beyond this single driver. High-risk genomic profiles (HGP)-additional chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia-positive cells, Philadelphia chromosome-associated rearrangements, and high-risk somatic mutations detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS)-are present at diagnosis in roughly one-third of chronic-phase (CP) patients and shape response, progression, and survival. We propose a clinically actionable taxonomy of HGP based on biological origin, detection method, and TKI sensitivity. Central to it is ASXL1, the most consequential somatic variant in CML. ASXL1 mutations are present in 7-14% of newly diagnosed CP patients and independently predict inferior response, treatment failure, and ABL1 kinase domain mutations, even with potent frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including asciminib. By contrast, the adverse impact of Ph-associated rearrangements is overcome by potent TKIs. A newly described sixth pattern of mutation dynamics-de novo DTA (DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1) mutations in 24% of optimal responders with a median doubling time of 68 days-supports serial NGS monitoring every 6-7 months as a noninvasive complement to cytogenetics. We present a practical decision framework across the key management nodes of CML: diagnosis, monitoring, treatment failure, and blast phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42905187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.