ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation in prostate cancer detection: current evidence, clinical positioning, and translational gaps.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation is one of the most consistently documented molecular alterations in prostate cancer, with high prevalence in malignant tissue and a well-established relationship with transcriptional silencing. However, despite more than two decades of biological and diagnostic investigation, GSTP1-based testing has not acquired a clearly defined stand-alone role in contemporary prostate cancer detection. This narrative review examines why extensive biological evidence has not translated into routine clinical use and where, if anywhere, GSTP1 testing might provide meaningful value within current diagnostic pathways. Evidence from prostate tissue, urine and circulating cell-free DNA is considered alongside the effects of biospecimen selection, preanalytical handling, CpG target selection, assay design and interpretation thresholds. Tissue demonstrates the most reproducible signal and has achieved partial clinical translation through multiplex testing such as ConfirmMDx, whereas urinary and blood-based approaches remain investigational. Recent urinary findings, including in men with moderately elevated PSA, are promising but remain preliminary and have not established incremental value beyond contemporary risk assessment, biomarkers and multiparametric MRI. The translational priority is therefore not to demonstrate again that GSTP1 detects prostate cancer, but to determine whether a standardised assay provides reproducible, nonredundant and clinically actionable information at a defined decision point. Future development should prioritise clearly specified target populations, analytically validated assay configurations, clinically significant prostate cancer as the relevant endpoint, and prospective evaluation against contemporary diagnostic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.