ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Tenant Right-to-Counsel and Emergency Department Use in Low-Income and Uninsured Populations.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvictions are associated with numerous health harms, contributing to increased emergency department (ED) use. In 2017, New York City introduced the nation's first tenant right-to-counsel program, which lowered eviction rates by providing free legal representation to low-income renters facing eviction. Health implications of this policy are uncertain.
objectiveTo test whether right-to-counsel decreased all-cause and cause-specific ED visits by low-income and uninsured individuals.
designRetrospective cohort study of all-payer ED utilization data (1/2016-2/2020) leveraging the staggered implementation of right-to-counsel by ZIP code as a natural experiment. Subgroup analyses assessed heterogeneity by right-to-counsel implementation phase and age group. Secondary analyses examined cause-specific ED visits.
participantsMedicaid-insured and uninsured individuals in New York, NY.
interventionRight-to-counsel implementation status by ZIP-month. MAIN MEASURES: All-cause and cause-specific ED utilization rates per 10,000 Medicaid-insured or uninsured ZIP residents. KEY
resultsIn total, 8,206,986 ED visits (21% by residents of right-to-counsel ZIP codes) were aggregated to 8550 ZIP-months. While there was no overall association between right-to-counsel implementation and all-cause ED visits (difference-in-differences estimate -10.8 [95% CI -32.8, 11.2] visits per 10,000), we observed a significant reduction in ED visits in ZIP codes targeted for the earliest intervention phase due to their high eviction risk (-26.4 [95% CI -52.6, -0.2] visits per 10,000) and a marginally significant reduction among children (-32.4 [95% CI -67.2, 2.4] per 10,000). In cause-specific models, right to counsel was associated with increased mental-health- and substance-use-disorder-related ED visits (2.5 [0.2, 5.8] and 2.7 [0.4, 5.0] per 10,000, respectively), with no significant differences in visits for ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions.
conclusionsTenant right to counsel was associated with reduced all-cause ED visits among residents of neighborhoods included in the first of three intervention phases and possibly among children, suggesting health improvement in certain populations. Further research is needed to understand increased ED utilization for mental health and substance use following right-to-counsel. Policymakers considering similar eviction-prevention programs may want to consider potential health benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42905183What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.